Many management interviews are based around assessing not only a person’s level of experience and knowledge but also their personality.
Interviews for managerial positions often include evaluation of the interviewee’s personal characteristics, along with his/her professional background. In my opinion, team leader’s personal qualities are essential when assessing if the person is qualifies enough to be a manager. In this essay I shall firstly discuss the importance of being a person of high moral standards and secondly, other soft skills required to be a qualified manager.
As stated above, one of the key factors for being a manager is the system of values a person has adopted. In order words, would a person want to efficiently manage a group of people, he/she should be someone each member of the team trusts and respects. From my own experience, I can tell that I feel more confident and therefore, do a better job when working with a senior colleague, who creates a comfortable and a positive atmosphere in the team.
At the same time, there are other qualities that are significant when considering a person’s candidacy for a leading position within an organization. These qualities include such soft skills, as emotional intelligence, time management skills and ability for coaching. All of these are greatly useful when performing top level tasks. For instance, successful task completion can only be achieved if the team lead does not stress other project members and this way encourages and motivates them to come up with new ideas or solutions. As I have already mentioned, it is also important to be able to meet deadlines without artificially putting too much pressure on the team members. And last, but not least, a good leader has to be skillful enough to pass knowledge top to bottom for their future replacement by the coming generation of specialists.
To sum up, personality is one of the most valuable qualities for a manager, however I believe there are also other skills that need to be developed in order to succeed in such a responsible role.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-08 | amanda.mosby | 61 | view |
| 2019-05-08 | amanda.mosby | 61 | view |
| 2018-10-09 | marosa | 95 | view |
- Some people think that the advantages of advertising sports products through famous sports players outweigh the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree? 78
- With increase population and even growing urban centers, many countries are losing their natural beauty spots.What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty?How can this be solved? 89
- More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endangered list.What are the reasons for this?What can be done to solve the problem? 78
- You have recently attended a 90th birthday party of a close relative. It was successfully organised by hotel staff. Write a letter to the manager and say– Describe the event.– Talk about the facilities provided to guests, especially the elderly.– Me 84
- With increase population and even growing urban centers many countries are losing their natural beauty spots What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty How can this be solved 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: ALSO_OTHER[1]
Message: Use simply 'there are other' or 'there are also'
Suggestion: there are other; there are also
...lities for a manager, however I believe there are also other skills that need to be developed in ord...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for instance, i feel, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09937888199 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09226333158 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61801242236 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9573558828 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.307692308 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158195804077 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583760119528 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365223769155 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934942720635 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316906288537 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.