Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative
impact on both individuals and society.To what extent do you agree?
It is often argued that social communication gateways like Facebook influences people as well as societies and local communities in a negative way. This essay disagrees with this statement because these sites acts as a common platform for individuals from different backgrounds and helps in solving many socio-economical problems.
There are many reasons why social media plays a vital role in an individual’s life. Firstly, they bring folks from different parts of the world together. This helps in building new relationships and provides an opportunity to learn about diverse cultures. These websites have even helped many individuals to find their lost families. In addition, those who share common interests can participate in groups and forums. For example, Facebook has several community groups created by people with extra-ordinary skills in art, music, dance or cookery. Those who are interested in these activities can join these groups and learn new skills. In this fast moving world, public networking portals give relaxation to those who do not get time to meet or communicate to anyone outside their community circle.
Another important advantage of such sites is that they allow individuals to voice their views, opinions and also protest against any global issues. There have been instances where cases like violation of human rights, child trafficking, child abduction, and so on were reported to government authorities through such forums. Recently, photos of a missing kid were posted On Facebook by their family members. Due to the large influx of likes and shares, the picture became quite famous and authorities had to take quick measures to resolve the case. As a result, the culprit was captured and penalized under law. Hence, such forums help in awakening the duties and responsibilities of the authorities and compel ordinary citizens to obey the law.
In conclusion, technological advancements in the field of internet have always helped mankind. By proper usage of publically connected web sites people can unite and work together for a global cause.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-28 | learnafren | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-11 | rohit1234 | 89 | view |
- Last month you had an overseas holiday with some friends where you stayed at their house. They have just sent you some holiday photos.Write a letter to your friends. In your letter:•Thank them for the holiday and the photos•explain why you didn’t wr 73
- An art gallery in your town is looking for volunteers to work in the gallery at the weekends. You would like to do some work in the art gallery in your free time.Write a letter to the art gallery. In your letterexplain why you would like to do unpaid work 73
- News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures.Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.What is your opinion about this? 73
- Your next door neighbour owns a small dog that barks throughout the day and the night.Write a letter to your neighbour requesting that something be done about the dog. Include in your letterYour reason for writingWhat you would like to happeA nice, respec 73
- A person’s health is their own responsibility rather than the government’s responsibility.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...well as societies and local communities in a negative way. This essay disagrees with this stateme...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4128440367 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91242943745 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642201834862 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7274328124 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172566110488 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456083918207 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364774465179 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970347785828 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0156398003084 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.