With the advent of technology, the way people communicate with each other changed dramatically. Some people believe that social networking sites such Facebook has a negative impact on individual and is a threat to society. I agree that at a society level social networking sites has negative effect whereas at an individual level it has positive impact.
On one hand, social networking sites have changed the world of human. In a fast paced world where an individual working round the clock, it became impossible to connect and communicate with friends and family daily. At an individual level people started using social networking sites to maintain and build relationships that are useful for both personal life and professional life. People can connect to anyone around the world using these networking sites and consequently communicate and learn from through online and utilize them for their benefit. For example there are multiple channels available in YouTube which provides information from making soap to building home.
On the other hand, people are attached to their networking devices and disconnected from real world activities. They are neglecting their family for their new found interests. Some people are even immersed in virtual world and sharing their too personal information and becoming the prey to hackers and online scams. People stopped actively participating in social activities and are often away from meeting with family or community thus living in isolation. This trend not only effect individual as a person but also has a detrimental effect on the future generations. When present generation living in isolation and not learning about social norms, how can they guide next generation? This has to be taken care by both society and people mindset and habits.
To conclude, although, social networking sites are beneficial to an individual, we should not forget about the society and utilize the knowledge for developing it. At society level there should be more frequent meetings with in the community to ensure proper communication between people around.
- Technology provides us a lot of means to communicate But now that people have the ability to talk to each other in wider variety of methods our communication and social abilities have taken a step back Why does technological advancement hurt nontechnical 89
- Childhood obesity is becoming a serious problem in many countries. Explain the main causes and effects of this problem, and suggest some possible solutions. 11
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree? 73
- Sales companies should recruit people who are hungry for money as they will make the most dedicated workers.Do you think money is the driving force behind hard work? What factors should be taken into consideration when recruiting staff for sales positions 56
- Even though Globalization affects the world’s economics in a very positive way, its negative sides should not be forgotten. Discuss. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[7]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...iving in isolation. This trend not only effect individual as a person but also has a d...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, thus, whereas, as to, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37386018237 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74529171524 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534954407295 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5593580351 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3529411765 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264651491356 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936796108098 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119958077913 0.0667982634062 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176671735866 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118299456297 0.056905535591 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.