Many people believe that we should protect all wild animals while others believe we should just protect some of them.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the past few years, governments throughout the world have sanctioned various laws for the protection of flora and fauna. Whereas some commentators think that all wild animals should be preserved, other analysts defend the idea that protecting only a few of them would be adequate. In this essay, I shall examine research by environmentalists to discuss both opinions followed by my perspective.
To begin with, empirical observations show that all plants and animals are imperative for the food chain. Having said that, the extinction of any animal could cause numerous environmental problems. For example, recent research by the National Wildlife Centre has found that for the conservation of natural habitat, each wild creature has its role. Due to this, reason, all animals in the wild need protection from barbarous acts by humans such as hunting, using animal skin for decoration, or other purposes.
On the other hand, while some animals are on the verge of getting extinct, others are growing in abundance. The scattered attention of government and scientists over all the wild creatures might become the cause for the negligence of one particular species. Thus, instead of a holistic approach, undivided attention to only those wild species who are in danger and decreasing day by day would prove to be far effective in saving nature's diversity. For instance, the alleviating numbers of black leopards require additional protection laws, while the cattle, which is present in higher numbers should be given less importance.
To conclude, it is incontrovertible that the safety of the whole wildlife is a necessity for the prevention of hazards due to disruption in the food web. However, to ensure that some fauna should be provided more protection, especially the endangered ones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'natures'' or 'nature's'?
Suggestion: natures'; nature's
...uld prove to be far effective in saving natures diversity. For instance, the alleviatin...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, whereas, while, for example, for instance, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3006993007 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93451437879 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622377622378 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2512164164 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.615384615 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236625055298 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078948500074 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637412309137 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13898367419 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621848024575 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.