Nowadays, wildlife scatters humanlife around the world and we consider that the main life chain is connected between humans and animals because of living in the same land even though the number of wild animals is decreasing . According to the point of many people, the entire wildlife should be protected. But others think we ought to preserve some of wild animals. Certainly, it is a matter of thoughtfull discussion to conserve the wildlife.
On the one hand, wild animals are fundamental stem of human life even if the extinction of wildlife depends on the nature. Thereafter, it causes to disappear the entire nature. Therefore, most humans ought to favour to protect entire wildlife due to the root of the nature. It can be the creture of new age when people and wild animals live together.
On the other hand, some people contemplete that we should protect some of them. Actually, some wild animals are nourishing at the zoos or nature reserves although few genus of wild animals are preserving there. But the main reason why people tend to protect fewer animals, is foodstuff. It might not be intended for each animal which humans protect. In case, the relevance of nutrition is able to feed a few of them due to not being food shortages.Hence, the defense of some of wild animals is preferable to nourish at the zoo or nature reserve. Also, it can be striking idea to avoid the extinction of wildlife.
In conclusion,all animals are part of the nature. Each person ought to protect them due to the main link of entire world. The more we maintain the prosperity of wildlife, the more we improve our whole life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...the number of wild animals is decreasing . According to the point of many people,...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l discussion to conserve the wildlife. On the one hand, wild animals are fundam...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...if the extinction of wildlife depends on the nature. Thereafter, it causes to dis...
^^
Line 2, column 151, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'disappearing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: disappearing
...s on the nature. Thereafter, it causes to disappear the entire nature. Therefore, most huma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nature. It can be the creture of new age when people and wild animals live togeth...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people and wild animals live together. On the other hand, some people contemple...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld protect some of them. Actually, some wild animals are nourishing at the zoos ...
^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people tend to protect fewer animals, is foodstuff. It might not be intended for ...
^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Hence
...of them due to not being food shortages.Hence, the defense of some of wild animals is...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a to avoid the extinction of wildlife. In conclusion,all animals are part of th...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 19, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , all
...inction of wildlife. In conclusion,all animals are part of the nature. Each pe...
^^^^
Line 4, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... wildlife, the more we improve our whole life.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78571428571 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6457919979 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510714285714 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4499918873 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8235294118 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4705882353 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64705882353 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.01903807615 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299377251509 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991530076899 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093126115272 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180740222675 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668731742789 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.