In this fast pacing world, where almost every deal happens online with a few clicks, it has become more comfortable spending your wealth. This essay discusses the possible factors responsible for a complete wastage of currency and why economic saving must be there.
The world has seen a tremendous revolution in currency. Each year latest and improved digital currency is introduced, which transacts in milliseconds and provides a receipt. Due to the advantage, transactions increased per day, causing loss of all finance. Moreover, enticing advertisements and online discount sales convince people to purchase those things which are unnecessary goods. Overall, a single side of the coin, which is the adverse effects of technology on human behaviour is the leading cause of extra-spendings.
It is never feasible for sustainable life emptying your whole account. We never know what will happen next, and no source of income comes with the guarantee of the future; therefore, the fund which can help us in need of hour must be kept unused. It may be related to health, accident, loss of a job or in the worst case, the heart-breaking robbery. Thus, people not occupying the space for the emergency fund are responsible for their destruction.
Another negative impact of using all hard-earned finance makes us miserable when we require financial credits to purchase something crucial. Without money, the situation generates pressure, and the negativity spreads into life, having the loss of temperament, sadness and the loss of dear ones. Due to uncontrollable credit transfers into the online-sales' account makes us irresponsible and careless. Thus, this self-destructing negative behaviour about finance results in an unstable life.
In conclusion, it is never a wise decision to not keeping anything aside for our critical time. The blind spendings and an empty pocket produce the life full of negativity having inappropriate manners and habits.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Kamal2017
Essay Categories
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38235294118 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00879603884 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650326797386 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0314713818 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8823529412 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58823529412 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126877492208 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324487478853 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348525726816 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0633840730797 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328147573633 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.