Many people support use of animals for testing medicines for humans. Others believe it isn’t appropriate to use animals for such experiments. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, the advancement of modern medicines has changed the quality of our life substantially. However, there is a controversial debate regarding the question of whether using animals in experimental testing is appropriate. The reasoning behind each side of the argument will be discussed in this essay, and I will provide my perspective in the conclusion.
The supporters believe that the advantage of using animals in medical research outweigh its drawbacks. Firstly, the ultimate goal of this researches is to cure diseases that affect millions of individuals; Thus, instead of being emotional and consider the short-term effect of using animals, we should take a look at the extent the modern medicine helps people. Secondly, scientists argue that these tests have insignificant effects on the ecosystem of earth and wildlife. They foster and use animals, such as rabbits or rats, in an isolated condition, to eliminate any risk of an outbreak of contaminations or diseases. Compare to high-risk problems, such as global warming or dwindling numbers of endangered breeds, this issue seems insignificant.
However, animal-right activists question this practice due to various reasons. They argue that big pharmaceutical firms, which only consider their profitability, are the main players behind these studies, and they don't care about suffering animals. While there are other alternatives for the research development, testing on animals is the still most common practice due to its low costs. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that the result of the experiment on animals has the same effects on humans. There are many instances, that drugs with positive feedback from pre-trial testing on animals, had adverse effects on humans, causing irreversible damage on suffered consumers.
Taken together, while there are, indeed, concerns regarding experimental medical studies on animals, in my opinion, if we trade-off between the negative and positive sides, we would hope that continuation of this method would cure more illness in the near future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | aghalandar | 84 | view |
| 2019-02-20 | javaduddupudi | 73 | view |
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 73
- Nowadays larger distances are traveled by people to work and study on a daily basis Some consider it to be a negative development while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 82
- The Internet provides us with information about life and cultures of different countries and some people say it is not necessary to visit these countries to learn about them To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your opinion and 68
- Many high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 percent female. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women.To what extent do you 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...ere is a controversial debate regarding the question of whether using animals in experimental testing i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ide my perspective in the conclusion. The supporters believe that the advantag...
^^^^
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...rawbacks. Firstly, the ultimate goal of this researches is to cure diseases that aff...
^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... players behind these studies, and they dont care about suffering animals. While the...
^^^^
Line 9, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d cure more illness in the near future.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57961783439 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02125249719 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62101910828 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.541372521 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.142857143 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204495094742 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666600624967 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586224068407 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101186082874 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526554836939 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.