In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there
What is your opinion about this?
New residential places are required in a lot of urban areas, but the countryside is the only available place to build them. It has been argued that the countryside ought to be protected by not building houses there. Although shifting residences to places surrounded by nature might be beneficial in a sense that it would unburden the urban cities, I am of the opinion that it would bring more harm than good as it will ruin the natural beauty of the countryside
There are a number of reasons associated with the placement of houses in areas away from cities. First of all, it will share the burden of congested overpopulated urban areas. People prefer living in cities because of better opportunities for income and better living standards. This results in utilizing all resources which results in the scarcity of places to build residences. In these circumstances, shifting houses to the countryside would be beneficial. In addition, it will provide better job opportunities for people already living in the countryside. More population will not only lower the unemployment rate but also improve standards of living for people in countryside areas.
However, building houses in the countryside has some major impact on it. Firstly, the natural preservation of nature in that area will be ruined. Building places to live will demand deforestation which leads to a conversion of countryside areas into a concrete city full of buildings and houses. Secondly, it will bring pollution to the countryside. As there will be an increase of cars on roads, it will definitely increase the air pollution and would affect the health of not only humans but also the other habitats of that area including animals and trees.
In conclusion, while few people would support countryside housing development to ease problems from cities and providing income for people in the countryside area. I believe populating rural areas would damage the calm and relaxed environment of it and will pollute the area which will affect the health of all living organisms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-14 | mahsazamani | 61 | view |
- Some people think that studying history is a waste of time while others think it is essential to learn history.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Nowadays many young people are attracted to dangerous sports What makes these activities so attractive What measures should be taken to regulate such sports and minimize their risks 81
- Most people agree that money cannot be happiness. Why is happiness difficult to define? How can people achieve happiness? 61
- Some people think its okay to benefit from animals, while others think they should not be exploited. Discuss both sides and give your opinion? 61
- Some people think that children should be taught to be competitive in school. Others, however, say that cooperation and team working skills are more important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 462, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in the natural beauty of the countryside There are a number of reasons associated...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 689, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...living for people in countryside areas. However, building houses in the countrys...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13432835821 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86850606093 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492537313433 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.6030878895 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195082166972 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759931395396 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605915972965 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126434813411 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416062138858 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.