Modern technology has a great impact on our environment. Some say that people should adopt a simple lifestyle to solve this problem, while others argue that the technology itself should provide a solution. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In the modern times, due to rapid development of technology and science the pollution levels are getting impacted severely which is a great threat to environment. Further to this many say that every individual should practice a simple and toxic free life to give a solution for this; moreover, some defend that it can be solved even by technology and could address environmental issues.
On a clear note it is shown that development of technology has caused many environmental challenges. Many inventions such as cars, motor cycles are beneficial for humans but, at the same time they are hazardous and unfriendly to environment. Besides that, the toxic elements being released from refrigerators cause damage to ozone layer by which it is affecting humans and animals as well.
For this reason, we should minimize our lifestyle by less usage of automobiles even more, some minute things like plastic bags and other non-decompose elements. By the release of waste into rivers and gas being exhausted from factories should be controlled to maintain a healthy atmosphere. On the contrary, the consumption of fossil fuel release of them from the vehicles should be minimal.
Instead, the technological solutions give better benefit to become environment friendly. With the modern equipment the waste can be recycled and accordingly plastic can be replaced with paper made products. Most importantly, mobile-phones play a major role in placing environment into perilous condition; however, the signals need to be switched to low frequency by which birds and other creatures can be sustained.
As a matter of fact, without changing our lifestyle we cannot sustain an environment friendly life. Global warming depletes our existence; besides, that future generations cannot even see the endangered species in our nature. Finally, “Save nature and it save us”.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-19 | Jaydev Patel | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | Jaydev Patel | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | Saira Faiz | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-19 | SATYAVENI YANDRAPU | 84 | view |
| 2018-11-21 | jakirph365 | 78 | view |
- You have just started a new course at college and your tutor has asked you to write him a letter telling him something about yourself. 78
- Some people think that coins and paper money will vanish in a few years We will only use plastic cards or some other form of electronic currency Is this a positive or negative development 60
- Your neighbors have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house/ flat.Write a letter to your neighbors. In your letter•explain the reasons for the noise•apologize•describe what action you will take 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because oftechnology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 61
- Write a letter to the Mayor the head of a municipal government complaining about a situation in which some adolescents let their dogs run wildly causing danger 94
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...which is a great threat to environment. Further to this many say that every individual ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 261, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'saves'?
Suggestion: saves
...ture. Finally, 'Save nature and it save us'.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, but, finally, however, if, moreover, so, well, such as, as a matter of fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40955631399 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9492241518 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627986348123 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0727303412 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.214285714 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217045573107 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688388283535 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653369400551 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114948011463 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895663766842 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.