The money spent on space research has brought enormous benefit to mankind, but it could be more usefully applied. To what extent do you agree or disagree?(at least 250 words)

Essay topics:

The money spent on space research has brought enormous benefit to mankind, but it could be more usefully applied. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
(at least 250 words)

Astronomy knowledge has brought tremendous benefits to mankind, yet many people believe that money should be spent on global issues like famine, climate change or medicine development instead of spaceships or satellites. It is true that space research acquires a considerable amount of money, but the returns are highly justifiable.

On one hand, results from space exploration has consistently improved people's life, wealth forecast is an example of this. Sine the ancient time, our ancestors knew how to observe the sky to choose a suitable time for new crops. Nowadays, with the help of satellites, scientists can easily and accurately predict the wealth, hence improve the crop's productivity. Furthermore, without space technologies many advanced applications such as: 3G/4G internet, international call, GPS navigation would not be existed.

On the other hand, space research could also lead to many intangible benefits. Firstly, conducting a space program requires the cooperation between many different countries. This is a change to establish or tighten relationship between those countries. In addition, astronomy has been always a iconic symbol of advantaged science that inspires many generation of young scientists.

To draw the conclusion, I strongly believe that space research is a good-value-for-money investment. Space research will continue to rapidly develop and play its fundamental role in human's life.

(215 words)

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-10-03 Ly Huyen Tran 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'crops'' or 'crop's'?
Suggestion: crops'; crop's
...y predict the wealth, hence improve the crops productivity. Furthermore, without spac...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...rogram requires the cooperation between many different countries. This is a change to establis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... In addition, astronomy has been always a iconic symbol of advantaged science tha...
^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun generation seems to be countable; consider using: 'many generations'.
Suggestion: many generations
...bol of advantaged science that inspires many generation of young scientists. To draw the con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, so, in addition, such as, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 214.0 315.596192385 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76168224299 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16229492297 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.728971962617 0.561755894193 130% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9221105426 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171119788851 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569585495827 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492258093294 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100374312608 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564713333666 0.056905535591 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.83 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.