More and more information about the lives of celebrities is found in newspapers magazines and on line Why is this happening What are the disadvantages for the reading public

It is undoubtedly true that nowadays media is paying more attention to the lives of the celebrity than ever before. This may raise the profit of news agencies, but often society faces several negative consequences. In this essay, I will explain few of the reason behind this phenomenon and also illustrates some drawbacks of it.

Psychology, most of the people, are not strong enough to be self-confident and want to become popular among others. Consequently, we follow those people who are already popular, and consider them as an ideal for their life. Considering this psychological weakness, the media industry has started to publish the news of famous peoples, in recent days. Besides, information is ubiquitously available, and anybody can post about anything through online, and therefore celebrities themselves create more publication to enhance their popularity.

As a result of these publications, we forget who we are in reality, and what is our primary need. The most significant drawback is that showing a celebrity as a superior makes us feel inferior. To overcome it, we spend money to copy their lifestyle; and as a consequence, we lost most of our valuable saving. For example, we can see how the luxurious travel industries and luxury fashion brands are booming and making profits. Secondly, most of us forget the poor who need our help and support. Instead of spending money for expensive dresses, we ignore it is more pleasurable to see a smile on others face. As we are getting more self-centred, our society is getting more fragmented.

In conclusion, the way media industries are using our psychological weakness to make the profit is leading to an undesirable society. I believe that news agencies should be responsible to the community and publish more good news, instead of stories about celebrities’ life.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (7 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19463087248 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03276256152 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604026845638 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.9858180347 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.75 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192783547659 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588588592295 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575565683341 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113979610065 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225974504417 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.