More leaders or directors generally belong to an older age group but some people believe that young leaders are better To what extent do you agree disagree Give your opinion

Essay topics:

More leaders or directors generally belong to an older age group,but some people believe that young leaders are better. To what extent do you agree/disagree?
Give your opinion.

Mostly chairpersons and cheif officers are mature and are of higher age groups. However, some masses thinks that novice leaders are more effective and successful. I partially agree with this statement.

To initiate, there are some people who believe that young leaders are more favorite of the today's corporate world. The reason they assert is new generation flag bearers are more ambitious and brings whole new lot of energy to the board. Despite of the less experience, their willingness to adapt and lead their respective teams is outstanding. One fine illustration of this is sundar pichai, CEO of Google. He is quite young and dynamic, company is reaching new milestones under his leadership.

In addition to this, the inclusiveness of the young managers can not be overlooked. The reason most people asserts is the progressive accomplishments of these leaders that make them humble and great teammates. Moreover, every staff worker feel comfortable and friendly-like in their direction. For example, founder of the oyo, ritesh garg, is merely in his twenties and doing extremely well in leading his company.
On the face of it, there are many people who believe experienced and older leaders are their first choice. In accord with them, a veteran director holds the qualities like foreseeability and ample of wisdom. Also, their visionary approach and extreme knowledge helps any company to flourish in the long run. To substantiate their viewpoint, there are many old school leaders like Jeff Bezos, CEO and founder of e-commerce giant Amazon.

To conclude, In my viewpoint, the ongoing trend of young torchbearers is proving to be successful and effective, however the proficiency of old-time leaders is also vital for any organisation to safeguard their progress.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-02-28 abhirhetoric.68 68 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mazon. To conclude, In my viewpoint, the ongoing trend of young torchbearers ...
^^
Line 8, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... proving to be successful and effective, however the proficiency of old-time lead...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, for example, in addition, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30035335689 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8774665432 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611307420495 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5550345871 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2352941176 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6470588235 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200798571954 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598558130475 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681589952049 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105395069886 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296617312677 0.056905535591 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mazon. To conclude, In my viewpoint, the ongoing trend of young torchbearers ...
^^
Line 8, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... proving to be successful and effective, however the proficiency of old-time lead...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, for example, in addition, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30035335689 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8774665432 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611307420495 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5550345871 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2352941176 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6470588235 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200798571954 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598558130475 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681589952049 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105395069886 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296617312677 0.056905535591 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.