News stories on TV and in newspaper are often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this.
In the first half of the twenty first century, a wide assortment of news is spreading globally by means of media. News stories, as one of the most referred news categories, are being broadcasted with the relevant photographs. A large majority of individuals subscribe to its better implications than words and I am no exception of that notion.
To embark upon, it is a given than human’s brain is more attentive to pictures as comparing with sounds and words. When news is comprised of ample relevant pictures, in this way, not only can one be more appropriately engaged with specific news, but also the news is more deeply ingrained in their memory, as they do not forget at least in not-too-distant future. Thus, the better constitution of photographs in particular news is, the more far-reaching its influence on individuals would be.
Another point which could be deemed as undeniably favorable characteristic of photo-accompanied news is that they communicate with millions of people in the global by a universally accepted language, picture. Being confronted with a fair amount of headlines every day, it seems that people select news which aptly describes events with highly-correspondent pictures. No wonder, why the detrimental effects of the recent devastating flood in Lorestan province in Iran, as a salient instance, gained much attention when the pictorial news stories was spread by leaps and bounds, which an abundant amount of world-wide charitable deeds was carried out, as a result.
In way of conclusion, news stories, whether on television or in newspapers, tend to be more informative and better comprehensive, when a proper amount of dependent pictures are embodied. This approach, obviously, accounts for the famous statement “one picture is worth 1000 words”.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | Kaupo199 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | berryabhisheksn | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | mansoureh | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | PK_18 | 56 | view |
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both views an 84
- News stories on TV and in newspaper are often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this. 89
- You missed an appointment. Write a letter explaining what happened. In your letter include:What the appointment wasAn apology for missing the appointmentA request to reschedule 73
- Many people support use of animals for testing medicines for humans. Others believe it isn’t appropriate to use animals for such experiments.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
- Do you think a museum is to educate or entertain people? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-first
In the first half of the twenty first century, a wide assortment of news is s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 131, Rule ID: IS_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of' or 'is composed of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of; is composed of
...paring with sounds and words. When news is comprised of ample relevant pictures, in this way, n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, thus, at least, in particular, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34736842105 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26622380023 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621052631579 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.1975530219 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.545454545 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202026257346 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736574055843 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337671082641 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116737504741 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421271251585 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.