In recent decades, a great deal of consumers occupy technological devices, such as refrigerators or washing machines. To my way of thinking, while they have undeniable benefits for mankind, excessive use of such gadgets can contribute to the certain global problems.
Latest developments on the technology have made mass production and sales of various products available, resulting in more easiness and comfort in a human life. As an illustration, just hundred years ago it could sound as a craziness that you can keep meats for months, however, refrigerators allow people preserve their foods in the condition that will be useful for a quite long period. As a result of modern wide use of such consumer goods, daily chores are far more effortless and time efficient. These features are extremely essential, particularly in the last decades, as modern workload can be heavy and time consuming.
On the other hand, use of such technological devices in higher quantities brings greater energy consumption with itself. Since most of household energy is produced from fossil fuels and coals, this trend can result in the worldwide pollution and running out of certain resources. Even today the Earth is on the highest level of pollution in the history. Therefore, increased amount of customer goods can cause detrimental issues for the humankind. However, I believe the advancements of the modern technology can ameliorate the situation with utilising more nature friendly and renewable energy sources, such as solar energy or water energy, despite the fact that at least several years are required in order to make use of such power in all over the world.
To conclude, in spite of the fact that inclination of purchasing customer goods can result in particular global issues, technology seems to have long-term solutions. For the present, despite several benefits in our daily life, customer goods are more likely to bring about negative outcomes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Latest'.
Suggestion: The Latest
...tribute to the certain global problems. Latest developments on the technology have mad...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ikely to bring about negative outcomes.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, while, at least, in particular, such as, as a result, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25641025641 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82921152794 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602564102564 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1693987757 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.153846154 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184478213646 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611507695656 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559754679846 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115630550241 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466385185667 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.