Nowadays more and more people are spending less time at home.
Why do you think it happens?
What effect does this have on individuals and the society?
In the first half of the twenty first century, despite a fair amount of outstanding developments in people’s lifestyle comparing to that of past decades, it seems that their attendance at home has declined surprisingly. Perhaps the need to work for long hours, as a main culprit, is appropriately linked to this phenomenon.
People’s insatiable urge to reside and flourish in well-developed cities may be the key explanation why they are earnest to move to large conurbations. In this way, living in megalopolises like Tehran, for instance, means that not only do they should be tenacious and strong-willed to fulfill that ambition, but also they need to work for long hours than a standard amount. Being responsible for the expenses of their home, parents also have to work more severely, in some cases at weekends, to make up the exorbitant cost of living. No wonder, then, they are less present at home, spending time with their children or family members.
Considering the aforementioned repercussion, is has dire consequences both on individuals and the society in the large picture. For one thing, working for long hours puts a heavy strain on job holders and culminates in a wide assortment of predicaments including family-work conflicts, psychological hindrances and mental disorders. For another thing, although it may seem that the more you work, the better you are engaged with your company, it can stimulate less enthusiasm in employees and lead to regular job turnover and truancy, which is unmistakably an adverse ramification for their organizations. Society as a whole, ultimately, witnesses a less collaboratively compassionate demeanor of its members, if they are less attendant at home at spend time with their family members as a tinier group.
In way of conclusion, working for a great deal of time in order to stave off the gravity of financial difficulties one has encountered living in a metropolitan community, is deemed to be a prominent rationale behind not spending ample time at home. This, hence, has brought about subsequent drawbacks including work-family impedance for individuals along with mental disturbance and less productive tendency to be well-engaged to the society in the large picture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-26 | miladrezaee | 84 | view |
- Some people think that children should learn to compete, but others think that they should be taught to cooperate with others. What’s your opinion? 56
- In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there.What is your opinion about this? 78
- News stories on TV and in newspaper are often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this. 89
- The high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising but not the real need of the society where such products are sold. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person’s culture and character from their choice of clothes.Do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-first
In the first half of the twenty first century, despite a fair amount of outst...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, so, then, thus, well, another thing, for instance, for another thing, for one thing, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29411764706 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24521621122 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582633053221 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.6414925428 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.5 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.75 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230625931811 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086465769135 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529151957696 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138124160546 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385130118443 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.