Nowadays museum and historical sites are visited mainly by foreign tourists rather than by locals. Why is this happening? What can be done to get locals to visit museums and historical sites more often?
It has raised public concern over the past decades why overseas visitors are more enthusiastic for visiting museums and historical places compared with locals? There are numerous reasons for this problem and some measures can be taken to stimulate more local inhabitants to visit museums and historical places.
First of all, from an economic perspective, the people who live in the host country are engaged with some financial issues find it difficult to pay costs of entrance, therefore they prefer spend leisure time with alternative entertainments. Indeed, for these people, the necessities of life overrides the important of obvious the historical places. Although this amount might be favorable for the tourists who choose to travel and they are willing to pay this expense. Secondly, notwithstanding the fact that these places are very worthwhile, indigenous people are less likely to allocate their time for visiting the place that they have already known. In other words, these sites can be found more repetitive and tedious for local people.
Despite this, attendance of local people could be encouraged in a variety of ways. First and foremost, governments should raise public awareness about the importance of these locations. Veritably, museums and historical buildings should be taken into consideration as a part of one’s cultural heritage that are passed down from their ancestors. Government’s authorities, For instance, could held cultural festivals and events in these locations and at the result people find these places more enjoyable and attractive. Furthermore, devoting discount on entrance price or allocate free tickets to local people and particularly children for visit heritage sites in a regular basis.
From what have been discussed above, we may conclude that the less public awareness about valuable historical places and financial issues result in reduction in number of local visitors over against foreign visitors. Although if the solution mentioned above are implemented, all people are more likely to be encouraged to visit these sites.
- You recently organized an all-day meeting for your company, which took place in a local hotel. In their feedback, participants at the meeting said that they like the hotel, but they were unhappy about the food that was served for lunch.Write a letter to t 89
- The growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health caresystem in an effort to deal with the health issues involved. Some people think that thebest way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lessons inthe s 73
- Some people think that teenagers should follow what the old people say whereas some believe that it is good for teenage people to challenge what old people say Discuss both opinions and give your opinion 80
- Culture and traditions change from generation to generation Why does this happen What can be done to change it 92
- Write a letter to the company that sold you the item. In the letter: give details about the order you made explain what was wrong with the item tell the company what you want them to do about it 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 402, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'hold'
Suggestion: hold
...apos;s authorities, For instance, could held cultural festivals and events in these ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 691, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isit heritage sites in a regular basis. From what have been discussed above, we ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.571875 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84933517465 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6452603883 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.357142857 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268044739074 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999431229172 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802389178935 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185522393982 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845269375047 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.