Nowadays, people living in large cities face many problems in their daily lives. What are the problems? Do you think the government should encourage people to move to smaller towns?
People residing in metropolitan towns come across a numerous issues on daily basis. Lack of long term planning of metropolitan towns and increase in uncontrolled migration of people from small towns to large towns is root cause of many problems. In my opinion, the government should encourage decentralization of metropolitan towns to smaller towns.
The main problem faced by residents of large towns is inadequate residential area which force people to live in informal settlements. This leads lower income group and economically weaker sections live in non-habitable areas which lack basic infrastructure facilities like water supply, sewerage and solid waste management which are essential to live quality of life. Another problem faced by residents of metros is long hours of commuting to work from home which disturb the work-life balance as many hours daily are wasted on unproductive travelling which could be put to better use. In addition, this commuting wastes lot of petrol which is a major cause of pollution in metro cities and cause lung related diseases like Asthma.
Looking into the reason above it is evident that this uncontrolled urban agglomeration should be discouraged by government to give better quality of life to metro residents. Each town should be pre-planned to cater only certain amount of population and migration should be completely banned after attaining that population. In addition, government should facilitate smaller towns with better facilities like employment opportunities, better public transport, malls, and recreational areas. For instance, satellite towns around Ahmedabad like Sanand, Kalol and Kalpur are developed as industrial hub which encourage residents to move from Ahmedabad to these towns and alleviated the stress on infrastructure of Ahmedabad. This will encourage migration to smaller towns to much extend.
In conclusion, people living in metro cities especially lower income group people face number of problems from basic infrastructure to pollution. It is high time government should step in and make people to move to smaller towns by facilitating them with better facilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-01 | bhatvishal@ | 67 | view |
| 2018-06-01 | NKB | 73 | view |
- Some people argue that technological inventions such as mobile phones making people less interactive. Do you agree or disagree 73
- It is often considered that change is more beneficial to people than trying to avoid it and have everything remain the same Do you think the advantages of change outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some people consider price as the most important thing to consider when buying a product (such as a cellphone) or a service (e.g medical treatment) do you agree or disagree? 56
- Companies use a variety of methods to improve the sales of their products. What are those methods? Which is the most effective method ? 60
- Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces How do you think it has changed the way we work Do you think there are more disadvantages then advantages 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'issue'?
Suggestion: issue
...tropolitan towns come across a numerous issues on daily basis. Lack of long term plann...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 769, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...ll encourage migration to smaller towns to much extend. In conclusion, people li...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5749235474 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02846184434 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535168195719 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2194171076 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.214285714 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330131718691 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126118221537 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755428751546 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223822815849 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805433819926 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.