Nowadays people make new friends through social network and internet chat groups. Some people think this is good. Others think that face-to face interaction is essential. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, with development of technological innovations, the way we communicate has been revolutionized. Strangers are interacting easily through social networks and internet chat groups. Some people think this is good because it helps us make friends much more easily. While others, on contrary, believe that face-to-face communication is important. Personally, I think either way is helpful for us to keep touch with each other.
On the one hand, for those who prefer staying indoor than outdoor activities, the internet provides them an opportunity to open their heart, It becomes much easier for the introverted person to socialize through online chatting apps. Secondly, social networks improve the efficiency of making new friends especially in the aspect of international trading and business. People do not need to travel far away to have a chat or meeting, while it reduces the cost at the same time. Thirdly, it becomes possible to choose who you like to encounter with through internet. You do not need to waste time to know about someone by meeting them for several times until you realize that he or she is not your friend. The only thing you need to do is to google him and see his personal file on Facebook before you want to have a close relationship.
On the other hand, traditional face-to-face communication is advocated by other people who believe that only through meeting in reality can we know someone for real. Firstly, by face-to-face interaction, can we have eye contact with each other so that we can get better understanding of each other. Secondly, we can share emotions by smiling, hugging only when we meet each other. Thirdly, it is said that people are easily cheated by making friends on social network or through chat group because of online fraud.
In conclusion, I personally believe we need both way to make friends. We need to visit and hang out with people so that we become closer and the relationship last longer. At the same time, we should take advantage od social net work to meet new people as long as we take good care of ourselves from being cheated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-04 | cocosasia | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | ishpinder45 | 87 | view |
- With internet improvements, people can leave views or opinions on certain goods or services that they have purchased. Is it a good or a bad thing. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Nowadays people make new friends through social network and internet chat groups Some people think this is good Others think that face to face interaction is essential Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Grandparents play a big role in bringing up the children. Do you think it is useful for grandparents? Discuss reasons with your opinion and give relevant examples. 56
- Nowadays the increased amount of garbage(waste)is a real concern. why is this happening? What can be done to resolve this? 56
- some young people are leaving the countryside to live in cities or towns only old people live in the countryside What are the problems of this issue What can be done to solve this problem 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94366197183 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78058847859 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549295774648 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5069926612 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7222222222 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314328479223 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102929602605 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818774699022 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191995169109 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863345503939 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.