Nowadays people make new friends through social media and internet chat groups. Some people think it is a good idea. Other think that face to face interaction is essential. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Technology has changed our lives tremendously such as online sites to talk with friends and relatives without concern of time, but on the other hand benefits of physical meetings can never be replaced by the artificial media. I believe we should try to arrange get together whenever we can get time.
Social media has reduced the gap between the people. People have been extremely busy in their work life; proving themselves: gaining new skills: meeting deadlines: and delivering quality work that they do not get time to meet the relatives in person.
Firstly, in this era social media sites- Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat- have played an incredible role, where you can talk to your loved ones at any time, can drop SMS and they will answer at their convenience. People feel less lonely. Secondly, Misunderstanding has been reduced as they know your busy schedule. Thirdly, these websites are also playing part to solve problems. You make friends from your office, experts, relatives, schoolmates. If you get any problem, you can ask related person and get solution instantly. Additionally, it is cheaper as internet access is widely available at minimum price due to competition among service providers, while going out in restaurants have become quite expensive. As per study, each year internet users are exceeding with steep percentage.
Nevertheless, another group thinks that social media groups are not the replacement of face to face meetings. Meeting personally creates more emotions and bond is stronger. Meet ups are specially organized in busy life routine, which gives idea to another person, how much important are they. People do activities together and children have fun. For instance, if my sister lived in another country, I would have never felt so much closer to her. You can arrange different kind of activities like Barbeque party in the back of the house, wall climbing for children, traditional games to engage all of the family.
In conclusion Physically meeting creates a stronger bond while online chats reduce the time of response. I will strongly suggest that we should meet each other more often
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-08 | Kapu1456 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-05 | elveslord77 | 84 | view |
- Some people prefer to plan activities for their free time very carefully. Others choose not to make any plans at all for their free time. Compare the benefits of planning free-time activities with the benefits of not making plans. 73
- Some people believe in the traditional idea that the woman’s place is in the home, while others say that idea is outdated and that women should play an increasingly important role in the workplace of the future. 73
- You are relocating to a new city. write a letter to an agent to arrange a house for you and your family.When and why are you relocating.what kind of house do you want? 75
- More and more companies are allowing employees to work at home Do you think this is a positive or negative development 69
- Money is important in most people's lives. Although some people think it is more important than others.What do you feel are the right uses of money? What other factors are important for a good life? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... instantly. Additionally, it is cheaper as internet access is widely available at ...
^^
Line 4, column 594, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...r children, traditional games to engage all of the family. In conclusion Physically meeti...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19075144509 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67342758938 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650289017341 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.597269561 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149305347224 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444218630941 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051061914562 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730529108485 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317695256173 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.