Nowadays young people lack an understanding of how to manage their finances after they finishing high school. Explain why they do not know how to manage money and how this can be changed.
The reality of youngsters lacking knowledge about financial management after graduating high school has always been a topic of interest. This issue is caused by a number of factors and certain measures can be taken to mitigate this situation.
The problem can be attributable to two principal factors. Firstly, schools do not focus on factoring financial management courses into their curriculum. They suppose that students should concentrate on class subjects such as math, literature, science,... to attain outstanding academic results which play a central role in passing university entrance exams. Secondly, parents also fail to prepare this essential skill for their children before getting into the real world. Youngsters do not mind saving their money or paying any bills by their salary in their daily life; therefore, they can not form their opinion on managing their personal finances.
However, several important steps can be taken to deal with this problem. First of all, schools should incorporate life skills into the curriculum to equip financial management knowledge for final year students. By launching experience activities, schools can help students more confident and knowledgeable through realistic view of how money can be utilized efficiently in the adult world. Secondly, parents should raise children's awareness of how money is earned, how to make an effective budget and save their money. With this supportive environment, youngsters would have opportunities to approach money early and can make wise financial decisions later in life.
In conclusion, there are various reasons to explain for ignorance of financial management skills among school leavers, but workable solutions are available to eradicate its adverse effects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 251, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...bjects such as math, literature, science,... to attain outstanding academic result...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63018867925 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80645139907 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660377358491 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2070754212 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.571428571 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344242346852 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101803496607 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616374926107 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181163073627 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630115654629 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.