As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that the drivers should cover the costs. Discuss both views and give your opinions.
It is true that there are a lot of money has been spent on improving road systems to adapt the increase in the number of cars nowadays. While some people think that cost should be covered by the government, i believe that the drivers should contribute partly.
One the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why the cost of improving road systems should be spent by the government. Firstly, if this spending can be covered by the government budget, it means its inhabitants will have more money which can be used to allows them to adapt their basic human needs. For example, in many underprivileged countries where there are many people live under detrimental living benchmark, they can save a whole of money to buy foods for their families. The second reason is that augmenting infrastrutures is the responsibility of the government. Its annual budgets have been contributed by every people through tax policies, therefore, it should be used for serving social needs.
One the other hand, i believe that that spending should be devoted by drivers for some reasons. Firstly, if it can be payed by the drivers, the government can focus their annual budget for another social needs. For example, in Vietnam, the drivers must buy ticket whenever they used free-ways. The government used that sources of money to improving hospital quality. Consequently, people will have better health care systems. Furthermore, despite the road systems spending will cost the drivers a great deal, they will have a well-constructed ways to use which means that they can drive safer, faster and save a whole of spare time to do what they want, like excercising or reading books to broaden their knowledge.
In conclusion, although the way that road systems spending should be payed by the government is advantageous by some reasons, it seems to me that it is better while the drivers contribute a part of that cost.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | hungnguyen2712 | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | hungnguyen2712 | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport City centre from 2003 2012 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 10
- There is no need to complete an education beyond a primary school level Do you agree or not 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television has destroyed communication among friends and family Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 11
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 73
- There is no need to complete an education beyond a primary school level Do you agree or not 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...st should be covered by the government, i believe that the drivers should contrib...
^
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'allow'.
Suggestion: allow
...ll have more money which can be used to allows them to adapt their basic human needs. ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 21, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...social needs. One the other hand, i believe that that spending should be de...
^
Line 9, column 544, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'way'?
Suggestion: way
...deal, they will have a well-constructed ways to use which means that they can drive ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96884735202 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73890069958 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473520249221 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.656884578 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.928571429 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297011965791 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111076111571 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765989129295 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217238873523 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763808161778 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.