The only way to improve safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences. What extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that governments should establish harsh punishments for drivers who commit accidents by not following the rule of traffic in order to improve safety of the streets and there are no other ways to tackle this problem. I disagree that this is the only method to make better environment for all car users.
It is true that enacting stricter penalties for driving offences is an efficient way to create safety of our roads. Since people usually think that they could get away after causing accidents easily, they will not feel guilty and thus, keep driving without abiding any rules. As a result, there is always a risk that car crashes occur more frequently. However, if stricter punishments are enacted, these driver with bad behavior will be forced to follow the traffic rules. Hence, less driving offences occur. For example, before Vietnamese government first announced the penalties for car accidents was at a minimum of 30 million Vietnam Dong, there had been almost 10 car crashes happened in every 10 minutes in Vietnam. This proves that with harsh punishments, people tend to have a better behavior when joining traffic.
However, giving stricter penalties for driving offences is not the only way to promote safety, there are some other ways that can also create better traffic on the roads. Firstly, the reason for people to not follow rules is that they are not well-educated in school. For that reason, it is suggested to fix people’s way of thinking when they are young by putting more lessons in all educational facilities. That way, drivers will develop their own good habits when driving cars. Secondly, governments can work with companies to make more security systems on the roads for drivers. For instance, Polish government has put into use the system that alarms car users any potential accidents up ahead so that they can go to safety zones until the polices arrest the driving offender.
In conclusion, although giving much stricter penalties is a good method to improve safety of the roads, I believe that there are several ways to reduce driving offences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-10 | ilets1478963 | 56 | view |
| 2018-07-10 | ilets1478963 | 61 | view |
- Shops should give preference in selling local food rather than imported food. Do you agree or disagree. 61
- You travelled by a long distance bus recently and your suitcase was damaged.Write a letter to the bus company. In your letter•Inform the bus company of when and to where you travelled.•Describe your suitcase and what happened to it.•Explain why the 87
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Nowadays young people spend too much of their free time in shopping malls This has negative effects on themselves and the society they live in To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 91
- Parents often give children everything they ask for and do what they like. Is it good for children? What are the consequences when they grow up? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this driver' or 'these drivers'?
Suggestion: this driver; these drivers
...r, if stricter punishments are enacted, these driver with bad behavior will be forced to fol...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03428571429 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49226722451 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545714285714 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0588510329 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.125 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8125 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276137584361 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919357201631 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810777894651 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194729364192 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586525798296 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.