The only way to improve safety of our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences. What extent do you agree or disagree?

Nobody doubts that road safety has become one of the major concerns for all. The number of traffic rules has increased significantly over the last few years. Road incidents are, of course, reduced by this change, and many think the government should punish rules breakers severely. I believe in this notion of making strict road laws against traffic offenders.

Firstly, drivers do not obey the transportation rules are the main cause of road accidents. Even though many regulations are made for road safety, there are some who do not follow them genuinely, leading to traffic collisions. For example, there was a huge accident happened recently in London due to the breaking of the red signal by the driver. Thus, a hard punishment should be imposed to prevent major accidents.

Secondly, Traffic rules are applied to avoid unnecessary jams on road. If people would adhere to these rules and regulations, there would be very fewer chance vehicles getting stuck on roads. For instance, In countries like the USA, road laws are very strong owing to people afraid of breaking them which in turn results in smooth traffic. Conversely, in some countries, they are carefree due to casual punishments, As a result, these are nations suffer from heavy traffic issues and accidents. Hence, the government should warn people about big punishments for breaking signals to prevent traffic issues.

To sum up, those who disobey road rules should be treated strictly in order to reduce road incidents and for smooth traffic. And as a daily commuter, I believe it will increase the safety of people on road as well.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in my opinion, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.203187251 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61389197008 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577689243028 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7529851193 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.625 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6875 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141193333592 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499465462706 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388340968726 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896495872267 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491948271896 0.056905535591 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.