In order to study effectively, it requires comfort, peace and time. So, it is impossible for student to combine learning and employment at the same time. Do you agree or disagree?
Undoubtedly, studying effectively has been a controversial issue over the last couple of decades. Considering this, some exports hold an opinion that it is impossible for students to combine learning and employment at the same time. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the above-mentioned proposal due to a variety of notable reasons.
First and foremost, one of the crucial factors is that studying effectively needs to spend much time. It is common knowledge that employment could spend a lot of time belonging to studying if student to combine learning and employment at the same time. For example, studying effectively needs to review after class, but those who are going to work have no time to review.
Another major contributing factor would be that studying effectively needs to focus on the study. It noteworthy that student cannot be distracted, but working have to make them distract. It can be taken as a live example that a lot of people keep working after work. SO, that means if students combine learning and employment at the same time , they need pay more attention on their works.
On the other hand, there are also some opponents who claim that working can help students to understand what they learn. They maintain that learning needs to be understood from working. However, it is ungrounded. This is primarily because their works is irrelevant to their studies.
In conclusion, it can be confidently conveyed that it is impossible for student to combines learning and employment at the same time. Therefore I am certain about the above-mentioned proposal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...learning and employment at the same time , they need pay more attention on their w...
^^
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...arning and employment at the same time. Therefore I am certain about the above-mentioned ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08076923077 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91104041208 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546153846154 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5711003134 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5625 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36292128041 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119869042362 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147590775978 0.0667982634062 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221056064814 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975153884168 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.