The ownership of car should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution.
To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. Write at least 250 words.
Due to problem of traffic congestion and environment pollution, there should be one car for each house, I completely agree with this. These days due to easily available finance option with relaxed criteria thorough banks as well as installment plans offered by car dealerships have enabled households to buy multiple vehicles. However, because infrastructure & road network has limited capacity and this has increased number of problems.
Traffic congestion is a problem faced by almost every person driving an automobile. Due to number of vehicles available in each family, every person of the family moves around in their own car even if they are to go to same place. We notice that number of vehicles are moving around with just single passenger. As road network has a limited capacity, this increases traffic on road. Routes are being choked during rush hours of mornings & evenings when people are travelling to & fro from their workplaces respectively.
Another problem is environment pollution. With each car, there is more use of fuel & thus more combustion which in turns results in increased emission of dangerous gases in environment. Notable gases among those are carbon monoxide (CO) which is very dangerous. These gases contaminate the air humans breathe in and thus this results in not just environment pollution but deteriorated health of living beings as well.
Example of this problems comes from my own family. I, my brother & my father, all three of us have our own vehicles. Despite the fact that my brother & I work in a same lane with distance of only 200 meters between our offices, we both use our own vehicles and go to work separately.
I would conclude this essay that the best way to overcome this problem is through restrictions of owning one vehicle for each household. Carpooling is very common these days where people going to same place share vehicle. They can do so instead of travelling in individual cars saving both time & fuel. Besides carpooling, people can use public transport, it will not only help financially troubled public transport sector but will also create a competition which in turn will improve quality of these vehicles as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-07 | dalexphilips | 89 | view |
| 2017-07-17 | hamzamanzoor | 89 | view |
| 2017-07-16 | hamzamanzoor | 89 | view |
| 2017-01-26 | xun | 79 | view |
| 2017-01-25 | xun | 78 | view |
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 50
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction.Do you agree or disagree?Provide relevant examples if necessary. 61
- You have been offered a job that will require you to move to a city that you have never visited before You have an acquaintance who lives there Write a letter to the acquaintance In your letter explain your situation say why you feel unsure about living i 86
- Argument Topic: "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced 50
- The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.To what extent do you agree with this statement? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 17, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'problems'' or 'problem's'?
Suggestion: problems'; problem's
...ving beings as well. Example of this problems comes from my own family. I, my brother...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1831.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11452513966 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72562948841 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59217877095 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9464729248 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3684210526 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8421052632 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.10526315789 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126275619435 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421098876339 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525622610158 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692215177316 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306622146033 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.