It is true that, the problem of pollution and traffic jams is escalating at a rapid pace. So, it is suggested that each family should own a single car to tackle this issue. I agree with the given statement as this contributes greatly by saving time, money and health of people.
Firstly, such an approach helps to reduce traffic congestions. If each house have only one car, then the number of motor vehicles racing on the roads decrease. This prevents the unnecessary wastage of time while one is struck in traffic jams. Moreover, car pooling can help the family to escape from the maintainance charges of an extra vehicle. The Canadian government, for instance, introduced the law of one car for four people. The enforcement of this law reduced the traffic congestions by 60% in one year and thus, this approach can be of great assistance to handle the issue.
Furthermore, owning too many cars cause more pollution. As every individual likes to travel in their personal vehicle, they might drive to work alone in a car which can carry at least three more people. This will lead to surplus emission of smoke by motor vehicles which, otherwise, is preventable. Additionally, pollution possess a potential health hazard as several individuals have trouble in breathing and suffer from other skin allergies because of it. The example is of Nigerian government who by promoting car pooling, was able to decrease the pollution levels by about 30%. This approach also reduced the respiratory problem of the residents significantly. Therefore, such a trend is a tested measure to reduce the levels of pollution.
To conclude, authorities can enact the law of owning one car per family. This can help greatly to deal with such problems easily and wisely.
- The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- You have recently moved to a different house.Write a letter to an English-speaking friend. In your letter•Explain why you have moved•Describe the new house•Invite your friend to come and visit 84
- Sales companies should recruit people who are hungry for money as they will make the most dedicated workers Do you think money is the driving force behind hard work What factors should be taken into consideration when recruiting staff for sales positions 50
- Climate change is a big environmental problem that has become critical in last couple of decades. Some people claim that humans should stop burning fossil fuels and use only alternative energy resource, such as wind and solar power. Others say that oil, g 73
- The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 67, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ill help to reduce traffic congestions. If each house will have only one car then ...
^^
Line 2, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... being struck in traffic jams. Moreover, car pooling can help the family to escap...
^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...moke by motor vehicles which, otherwise, is preventable. Additionally, pollution ...
^^
Line 3, column 678, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the residents significantly. Therefore, such a trend is a tested measure to redu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, at least, for instance, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98305084746 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71879199902 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586440677966 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.2191358968 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.5 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.75 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195712690741 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590364099252 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470520455462 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115129473942 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410214321158 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.01 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.