Ownership of mobile phones has risen dramatically in recent years despite the potential harmful effects they may have on our health and our society. Governments should introduce measures to restrict ownership of mobile phones to those who need them for their work.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is hard not to notice the rise in the use of mobile phones over the last decade irrspective of its harmful effects on our body. It led to the thought in the mind of some people of limiting the use of phones while others still disagree by simply relating the use of mobiles to the freedom of choice. In my openion government just have to take smart decision so that people will automatically limit their usage.
It has been proven that phones causes the increase of dopamine secretion in our brains which make them as much addicted as drugs; only proble is that, this effect is so slow that it is hard to point it out. Nowadays due to high demand, phones got cheaper and we can see them in the hands of adoscants. Also, we can see that people are stuck to the screens while eating, walking or just sitting in the bus which is leading to lack of communications, lot of road accidents and most importantly we are still finding its solution in our phones.
On the other hand, it is next to impossible thing to just limit the use of phones because people will feel it as a step on their freedom. Many people agree the harmful causes of the phones but it is a choise of an individual. We can use phones just for necessary things like paying bills, reading books, getting necessary information on the internet. Livelyhood of many people is depending on phones. Moreover, it will be against rights of the people from many countries to let government to introduce the measures for the usage of a thing that is already owned by a person.
In the end, I want to say that government can just hike the prices of the newphones to limit their user base despite that people should become more responsible for themselves because we should not expect someone else to take our personal decisions and freedom at the same time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-15 | nands71191 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that it is a good idea to give children a small amount of money each week to spend on what they would like Other people think that this is wrong and that it is a waste of money Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The tourism industry has grown enormously over last 50 year and there are few places which are unaffected by it However tourism rarely benefits the countries which tourists visit To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The advocates of international aid believe that counties have a moral obligation to help each other while the opponents consider it unnecessary because money is misspent by the government that receive it Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Some people believe that it is essential to include physical education classes in the curriculum for all school age children Others think that children s time is better spent on academic subjects Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- You forgot a wallet at a friend s place while you were there on the weekend Write him a letter to ask to return the wallet 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...the internet. Livelyhood of many people is depending on phones. Moreover, it will be against...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4833836858 5.12529762239 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43352677306 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525679758308 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.302788687 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5833333333 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199925760291 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758645327954 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485187698845 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121706183091 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281852762612 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 12.4159519038 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.