In the past the main role of teachers was providing information Today with various sources of information available to students teachers have no role in modern education To what extent do you agree or disagree

Nowadays, advancement of modern technology has brought abundant resources of information which are easily accessible to children. Therefore, some people who narrow teacher’s role down to a resource provider, do not consider them as critical as before. However, I would argue that teachers remain the most involved in students’ education, and there are no viable alternatives to replace their roles.

It is not deniable that there are various easy access information resources like googles and on-line education programs. Unfortunately, it can be overwhelming, and students as well as their parents often feel confused about how to select appropriate choices. One of the teachers’ roles is to guide students and family to the proper resources and tools to facilitate their learning. For example, at the beginning of Covid-19 pandemic, school were closed without offering any remote programs supervised by teachers. Accordingly, there rose substantial complaints from parents who were left in darkness and had absolutely no clues on which on-line education materials they should offer to their children. This unhappiness was solved immediately once the teachers re-entered into the picture and guided parents and children to the resources corresponding to individual curriculum.

Furthermore, another vital aspect of teachers’ job is to counsel students as a life coach as they grow and mature. They tailor specific course and programs to tutor their children to integrate their social, emotional and physical development. A real-life example can be seen from special programs in school, which are designed for children with special needs like autism and development delay. Although parents have broad access to the specific education materials from all sources, the teachers’ hand-on and individualized tutoring is irreplaceably essential for these so-called spoon-feed learners who require unique training on emotional development and social skills.

In conclusion, there is no doubt that modern society provides numerous information resources. However, I firmly believe that teachers continue playing important roles in education system, because their multifaceted roles are comprehensive and far beyond providing information.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1922.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87767584098 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04958139645 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623853211009 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0224747467 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.133333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249210479196 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833164119449 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589690775592 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168570915163 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696871820614 0.056905535591 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.