Pollution and other environmental problems are resulting from the way that many countries are developing and becoming richer. Some think this cannot be avoided.
The earth is faced with many problems and one of the biggest is air pollution which is happening because of the role of humans in the destruction of the environment. On the ground that environmentalists and people trying their best to protect humans' habitat from humans' activities. Accordingly, their endeavors' outcome is introducing numerous laws to force countries to intervene and preserve the environment. However, I adamantly hold the belief that this kinds of activities are not under the control of the people. I feel this way because of two main reasons that I will explore in the following.
First and foremost, the ultimate goal of any countries is increasing GDP which is the value of all the product produced in the geographical region of a country. It would be achievable only by developing and encouraging private sectors same as industries and companies to provide products which both have high quality and are economical. accordingly, if governments interfere and inhibit the activities of a sector, it would not only increase its cost but also will soar the price of the products. Admittedly, with a higher price, government and private sector will lose in the war of competition, since other countries will not make hinderance for the companies to have maximized profits and they can supply merchandises with the lower price.
secondly, a group of people believes that international agencies should oblige countries to protect the environment. However, I think that it not practical. As I mentioned previously, in the way of prospering, governments cannot and should not build obstacles for private sectors. Although they may vote for environmental reforms in the international gathering in order to preserve their face in the public and between journalists, the likelihood of cheating is a lot since they can take a better position in the competitions and provide products with the lower price to the world.
in a nutshell, I believe that air pollution and environmental destruction resulting from countries' development is unavoidable.
- 38 The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian, a company that manufactures men's clothing."Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric, we discontin 74
- TPO- 52 3
- In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 70
- Is it important to keep your old friends than making new friends? 70
- tpo 16 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 453, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...wever, I adamantly hold the belief that this kinds of activities are not under the c...
^^^^
Line 2, column 337, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Accordingly
...h have high quality and are economical. accordingly, if governments interfere and inhibit t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 529, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oducts. Admittedly, with a higher price, government and private sector will lose ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ply merchandises with the lower price. secondly, a group of people believes tha...
^^
Line 3, column 3, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...y merchandises with the lower price. secondly, a group of people believes that intern...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...cts with the lower price to the world. in a nutshell, I believe that air pollutio...
^^
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m countries development is unavoidable.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, i feel, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26139817629 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15048488514 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531914893617 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0346924239 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.642857143 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217874318287 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727716180672 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649459364907 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149014727446 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827786977331 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.