Q. Gap between rich and poor is increasing. What problems does it cause? What solutions do you suggest?
A. It is often believed that rich people are becoming more financially strong by each passing day whereas no improvement has been seen in people under poverty. The status quo shows the governments' negligence towards their country's development where leaders build castle in the air only. This essay will firstly argue the education system and the unemployment as two major problems and secondly, what steps can be taken to tackle the unwanted gap between both sides.
Outdated education system is referred to be the major threat as harmful government policies and privatization of schooling system has ruined it dramatically. Nowadays, it seems impossible for a poor family to admit their children in quality schools. In addition, situation of government institutes is incredibly weak as these institutions are struggling to provide even basic education to the students due to lack of educated staff and unhealthy systems. Hence, such things boost the unemployment which further give birth to corruption among society. Consequently, majority of society, particularly the incapacitated ones, do not get enough push to make their lives better. If a poor person gets an oppourtunity to complete the education, it will definitely fortify him to live complacency life.
Do we have correspondent solutions to overcome these issues? Indeed, the dual responsibility of both the society and the government will certainly change the situation. If government focuses on rural education specifically, education to female, by introducing scholarships to intelligent students including the affordable study courses with job placements, then the poor ones will get the prospects of bright future. Furthermore, non-profit organizations, charity trusts or rich families can also share their hands on the investments specifically for the people below poverty line which will create jobs for them.
In conclusion, current rich-poor gap is seriously a pain in the neck, still it can be reduced by modernizing the education system and the investment approach towards needy people with the dual support of the government and the society as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-08 | Urvashi Singh | 89 | view |
- You need a book and you didn t find it in the library Write a letter to a bookshop manager and say Describe the book Why do you need it How will you pay for it 79
- Question: the performance of staff can have significant impact on the success of the company.What can companies do to increase the Staff productivity? 61
- Some people believe giving gifts to friends and family is to show them that we care. Others think that there are more important ways. Discuss both and give ur views. 78
- Question: some people think making more money is being happier.What do you think? Can money buy happiness? 61
- Gap between rich and poor is increasing. What problems does it cause? What solutions do you suggest? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...under poverty. The status quo shows the governments negligence towards their countrys devel...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 797, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y fortify him to live complacency life. Do we have correspondent solutions to ov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, whereas, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51987767584 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08278116836 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645259938838 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1713934305 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.928571429 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120051148192 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0372914812243 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439725206709 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735940667765 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289498189031 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.