Question: Nowadays, all new town planning should include public parks, shopping malls, and sports facilities. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Question: Nowadays, all new town planning should include public parks, shopping malls, and sports facilities. Do you agree or disagree?

With the rising standards of life and urbanization, expectation of people have changed and it has become a common understanding that city should be developed with all amenities such as shopping mall, playground etc. I completely agree with the notion that every town must be designed to have all such facilities.
There are various reasons to support the town planning with availability of public ground, commercial complex and other attractions. The principal reason is that most of the big cities are very crowded and also having dearth of open space. In unplanned city, people do not find a place to walk or move briskly. Nevertheless, such problem can be resolved by the proper blueprinting while construction of town. A designated area for park and trees within park not only embellish the environment but also provides an opportunity for morning walk and exercise. Consequently, inhabitants remain fit and get eminent quality of life.
Another reason is utilization of land is very crucial in towns. Owing to skyrocketing the cost of land, it has become extremely challenging to start a business or set-up showroom on private land. The effective architecture provides a solution upto some extent by exploiting even a inch of space and reduce the cost of shops drastically. For instance, my brother was trying to venture car outlet but did not find an affordable individual area but got the good deal on big commercial complex at cheaper rate.
Finally the busy schedule of people does not allow them to go far for necessary items. Particularly for working couples, it is quite hard and inequitable to spend time on trivial things and penchant is all key amenities should be in the vicinity in order to avoid wastage of time. A case in a point is that unavailability of shops force people to spend weekly two hours more in travelling.
To recapitulate, though city can be developed without much deliberation and procedures, proper planning facilitate parks, malls, playground etc. which significantly alleviate the standard of life of common people.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-25 Parminderchani 56 view
Essays by user apurwar :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 458, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ated area for park and trees within park not only embellish the environment but a...
^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'starting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: starting
...nd, it has become extremely challenging to start a business or set-up showroom on privat...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ion upto some extent by exploiting even a inch of space and reduce the cost of sh...
^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...g commercial complex at cheaper rate. Finally the busy schedule of people does not al...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, if, nevertheless, so, while, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11572700297 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97791298229 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620178041543 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6789957678 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.411764706 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94117647059 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137075783331 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0370699903068 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451647191598 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0699723649352 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388834045118 0.056905535591 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.