Question: the performance of staff can have significant impact on the success of the company.What can companies do to increase the Staff productivity?

Essay topics:

Question: the performance of staff can have significant impact on the success of the company.
What can companies do to increase the Staff productivity?

The technological development has created huge differences in the operations of varieties of companies operating in the different corners of the world. Still, the truth that employees will keep playing the significant part in companies can never be denied. Numerous ways could help the companies to increase the staff efficiency and I would discuss the same in detail.
The employees in an organization comes from different educational background and are recruited as per the requirements. Few, here assert that they should not give much preference to companies success and just concentrate on what is being assigned to them. Adding, they are with a belief that the higher management is responsible for companies success and growth. Is that a really a case? Does companies do not emphasize on employees contributions?

Organisations should make sure that the staff recruited fit best to the place while doing justice to the roles and responsibilities to them. Although, one joins with needed experience or qualifications but still efforts should be made to train employees for upcoming technologies or advancements in their particular job. This, not only boosts the morale of the company but also makes them feel confident that they are providing their inputs towards the growth of their company.

Concluding, happy and confident employees give higher importance in organization's success and continuous efforts should be made by employees to keep the confidence high. Trainings can help them benefit, both on personal and on professional level. Thus organizations can help employees to contribute immensely in the overall development of them as well as the organization as a whole. <br>

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-22 Urvashi Singh 61 view
2019-05-22 Urvashi Singh 61 view
2019-05-22 Urvashi Singh 56 view
2019-05-22 Urvashi Singh 56 view
Essays by user Urvashi Singh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 248, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... on personal and on professional level. Thus organizations can help employees to con...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, still, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41666666667 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15395447554 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7568887143 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.142857143 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195755548814 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652781243633 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486451078519 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115380880013 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044510058215 0.056905535591 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.