The rising levels of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use In order to reverse this decline in the quality of life in cities attempts must be mad

In recent years, traffic jams and air pollution are rising due to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in many countries, so they argue that encourage people to public transport instead of using their cars to improve quality of life in cities. I am definitely convinced that the advantage of that people uses their cars less and public transport more can help for city quality.

On the one hand, in terms of cost-effectiveness, public transport wants to transport the largest number of people with the least number of trips. Such as a bus can carry more than 60 people, and it is even more crowded during rush hours that the comfort level is really incomparable to a private car. In addition, the pick-up and drop-off point of public transport is negotiated by the local government and the operating company. Therefore, some destinations may not be able to reach them directly while requiring multiple transfers or using multiple means of transport to reach the destination and some places do not have stations yet cause inconvenience for passengers.

On the other hand, public transportation can transport among a number of passengers while the cost of public transportation will be less than the cost of using private cars so that citizens can reduce their transportation expenses. The most important thing is that the use of public transportation can greatly reduce the number of vehicles on the road. Moreover, it not only decreases traffic congestion and accidents, but it can also decline carbon emission due to fewer vehicles and make the air better.

In conclusion, people using public transportation to travel has so many advantages. For the sake of the living environment of the next generation, we must import the quality of life of the city.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ansport more can help for city quality. On the one hand, in terms of cost-effect...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, really, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05460750853 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94313938636 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532423208191 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.0723421152 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.636363636 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6363636364 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3636363636 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232008303178 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872925748544 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569965135679 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143957560933 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611076055896 0.056905535591 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.