Science will soon make people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Some believe this is a good thing while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Recent developments in the medical field have increased the life expectancy manifold. Some people hold positive attitude towards this development while others do not. As per my opinion this is a positive development as good things outweigh the negative ones.

First of all, with increased life, the people can enjoy the privilege to live with their parents, friends and family for longer duration and this in turn improve the harmony in the society. People share an emotional bond with their parents and with longer life the bond will be strengthened. Such development will strengthen the social bond among the families and can make the society worth living and enjoying. Further, if people have longer life, they can indulge in various creative fields and can accomplish their dreams, that in turn bring a sense of achievement in them.

Turning to other side of the argument, increased older population will put the economical burden on the government as government has to spend money on maintenance of the aged population. More health care schemes and hospitals have to be introduced. Further, government has to pay the pension to all the aged population which will further hamper the country's growth as it will lead to budget cutting for other important sections. Increased life expectancy will further lead to increase in the population and hence shortage of resources.

Increased life expectancy can be very difficult situation for government to tackle, however, I believe that this is positive development as one can enjoy his life with his family and if infrastructure and policies were introduced by government then this trend can bring joy and happiness to our society.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation and hence shortage of resources. Increased life expectancy can be very di...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, so, then, while, as to, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20588235294 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75793131189 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544117647059 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.5404879106 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137800810494 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589735335937 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490875335817 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879280266265 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443085919136 0.056905535591 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.