Scientist and technology experts are imperative to the development of contemporary society. Some are of opine that they hold a better position of respect within the society, compared to musicians and artist. I however disagree with the former statement, in the below paragraphs I shall explain my point of view with relevant examples.
on one hand, scientist are cramped within the premises of a lab, thereby, they are not exposed to they outside world to show off their research. Their research in indubitably pivotal to the modern society. However, their accomplishment are not brought forward as often to the public. Consequently, public are unaware of their contributions to the society. For instance, 'Nikola Tesla' renowned scientist for his breakthrough innovation in the field of electricity. However, his work was not accepted, even after his death. It was in the early 19th century when his work was rediscovered, and he was rewarded with 'The Noble prize' 20 years after his death.
Its the same with technology experts, they have to put in a lot of hours for their work. Consequently, social recognition is left untapped for the masses. Moreover, they will have to abide by the government rules, as they would be working on technology that is not to be disclosed. Resulting, in a life of secrecy.
On the other hand, artist and musicians where always the center of the crowed from centuries. They had to portray their work for them to gain recognition, subsequently, they were always adored by the society. Furthermore, their popularity has gained them a lot of wealth. They are inundated by the attention they get by the public. To exemplify, 'Justin bieber' popular pop singer of the modern world, he gains enormous popularity from an early age. Became indispensable to the youth. Further, fueling his success.
To conclude, scientists and technologist are vital to the future of society, however, they were always under-appreciated for their accomplishments. whereas artist and musicians where adored for their art.
- The continued rise in the world s population is the greatest problem faced by humanity at the present time What are the causes of this continued rise Do you agree that it is the greatest problem faced by humanity 56
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 78
- The food travels thousands of miles from farm to consumer Some people think it would be better to our environment and economy if people only ate local produced food What extent do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 77
- in spite of advantages in made in agriculture many people around the world still hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 56
- Nowadays the way many people interacy with each other has changed because of technologh In what ways has technology affected the types of relationship people make Has this become a positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...oint of view with relevant examples. on one hand, scientist are cramped within ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...ble prize 20 years after his death. Its the same with technology experts, they ...
^^^
Line 9, column 149, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...-appreciated for their accomplishments. whereas artist and musicians where adored for t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1914893617 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00470032708 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537993920973 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 5.43587174349 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2473302693 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.2608695652 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3043478261 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30434782609 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0986237297433 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031747637106 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432777649329 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0665030980165 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283021362111 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.23 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.