Should parents allow their children to play similar TV programs and computer games as their friends do. Give your answer with relevant examples.
Though TV programs and digital games are not good for young age kids, but nowadays it is trending and involved very much in daily life. I consider that guardians must guide children what to watch and what to listen because these things are going to decide their future.
Firstly, I would like to spread some light on why children should act same as their friends do. This give them an opportunity spend time with their mate also however, it will help them to explore things in a broader way. In addition to this, they will acquire multicultural knowledge, language and religion.
Secondly, I consider that kids must be directed by their parents instead of permitting them to do things as per their friend. Because we don’t know more about their friend’s behavior, like & dislike. As we all know that all TV programs and digital games are not good. For example, recently a game called Joker was launched and many people died while playing the game because that had a speech which was pressurizing youngsters for suicide. However, physical games are better than digital games.
As we all know that children are easily moldable towards anything because their mind is eager to learn new things and guardian can inculcate good etiquette inside them. Kids can be taught many things. Notwithstanding, parents should focus on a particular training so that they can obtain mastery in that specific field.
In conclusion, I would say that instead of giving them assent to do same thing as their friend does, guardian should play a role of mastermind in order to show them a pertinent way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-23 | sandeep199222 | 61 | view |
| 2020-07-23 | sandeep199222 | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88148148148 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48452680868 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7822184575 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1428571429 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302955927028 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959324253396 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649074630672 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161491926176 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499983773975 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.