Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
Although such topics, never will yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on how the poverty-stricken countries can combat with their adverse situation can lead to thought-provoking discussions. My view is that irrespective of the many arguments on the either side, rich countries must share their help in aiding poorer nations. However, the impoverished nations should use this aid to build a better support system for life-long survival. Through the course of this essay, I would like to put forth my points and calculations considering both sides of the argument.
To begin with, any wealthy country having abundance of resources and technical facilities should strive to aid instant help to the deprived; Hence making the world a better place, and as a result they will gain potential stand in front of the other countries. Adding to this, they can also make a host of investment in these backward countries to help them generate wealth, and in turn take a fair share of it. For instance, United States has been
helping Africa to uplift itself from issues like poverty.
There are a few aspects that needs special consideration by the bureaucrats of economically backward countries. They must ensure to use these aids to improve their situation by educating and strengthening their own communities. For this they must set-up visions to forge better conditions in the future to help them prosper and become powerful in the coming years. For example, Singapore was hit by adverse conditions few years back after partitioning with Malaysia. They used all the help as a platform to curb the aggravated situation; thus, becoming one of the famous emerging countries of the world today.
I see that there is equally potential evidence to support the arguments I have provided and hence I reckon that rich nations should always help poor nations for a big social cause, and at the same time the authorities of the poor nations should use them to build a powerful system today to flourish in the future. I am inclined to believe that, in this way all the countries will prosper and grow in the coming years.
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 78
- Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skills. What are the causes? Suggest possible solutions. 73
- Smacking Children is the best form of discipline. To what extend do you agree or disagree. 84
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 73
- some people believe that there will be reduction in air travel in the future. Do you think that this trend is a positive or negative development ? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'will' and 'yield'.
Suggestion: will never yield
Although such topics, never will yield a consensual agreement, a constructive ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it. For instance, United States has been helping Africa to uplift itself from iss...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, i reckon, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0283286119 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82439528197 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560906515581 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.5046937013 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.785714286 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2142857143 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159366888896 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475629157061 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566261255 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0779689769631 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576040723846 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.