International forums, like 'United Nations Organisations', often rise concerns about detoriating conditions of poorer nations. Destitute conditions in Venezuela, Greece and African countries Somalia prompted them to request help from rich nations. Though it's not new, these events once again stirred the debate of flowing wealth from prosperous states to poorer one's. In this essay, we will postulate various conditions leading such situation and whether actions of governments are justified with relevant examples.
Fiscal policies in most of third world nations are insufficient and degrading economics leaving them no option but to seek help from neighbouring countries. This scenario, highlights the necessity of becoming self-sustaining. However, weak and corrupted ruling bodies, lack of natural resources, unemployment, draught are few of plenty reasons abstaining them from such a path. On the other hand, well developed countries also feel burdened to extend their services alongby looking after their internal requirements. Whereas, supplying minimum necessities to under privileged people is a way of exerting 'soft power' on them. For instance, China by funding to border countries like Nepal and Pakistan also manipulating them by undue influence. Similarly, Russia and America always try to control global politics by taking support from poor and small countries.
Hence, for future of their citizens, ruling parties of all impoverished nations need to take responsibility of uplifting their people without external support. In order to do so, global platforms like 'International Monetary Funds' should guide these less equipped bodies in proper directions. Furthermore, charitable societies are all over the world to serve poor and needy communities. As an alternative approach, officials should pave way for entrepreneurial concepts for making self reliant nations. Whenever, poverty stricken because of natural phenomena's extra help can be taken developing nations. Obviously, we cannot blame for unseen circumstances like 'Pandemic stroke' where reasonable support given without asking. For instance, India understanding the current scenario sent vaccinations to foreign places like Bangladesh and Mauritus.
After prolonged discussions on subject matter, in a nutshell, we can conclude the topic by agreeing that irrespective of countries economical stability all of us are under obligation to save others from poverty. Nevertheless, it's responsibility of governments of poorer nations to look after their demography before it's too late.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 518, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...king after their internal requirements. Whereas, supplying minimum necessities to under...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...agreeing that irrespective of countries economical stability all of us are under obligatio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, similarly, so, third, well, whereas, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2189.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91621621622 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05799912622 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672972972973 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7511304126 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.45 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198840821422 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522663700237 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07951633967 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125011692904 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468925911377 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.63 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 78.4519038076 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.