Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or it is the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
The economic crisis is a significant topic which is argued these days. One part of this discussion is about sharing the wealth between undeveloped nations and the other part concentrates on the responsibility of government which solves this issue. In my regards, poor countries can't help being in poverty without having enough resources if they don't receive the donation from the other nations.
As a matter of fact, the officials should improve the economic climate and don't let that goes down as a bust. In addition, the poor management affects the society so as to be in a bad way and also it might put the young generation under pressure so as to increase the level of crime in that countries. From the viewpoint of politics, poor countries should ask their neighbours to invest in different industries such as agriculture and educational system and this business can have a perfect meaning and it calls a win-win relationship due to the fact the empty-handed nations probably have a unique yield like African countries that export the coffee to other places.
Aside from the monetary discussion, such back-breaking problems happen in the information technology industry at first and disable more important part of society and finally, it ruins the whole country. In my perspective, these territories need to have expert engineers and skillful employees so as to develop the economic occasion. Consequently, the board of directors of companies and universities should make the job opportunities for qualified young generation and experienced people to put in the better situation and avoid some awful issues in the near future like poverty.
In conclusion, all countries should help each other in difficulties and remember we are the same members of a community.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-10-23 | ardalan.hajmehdi | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 279, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...is issue. In my regards, poor countries cant help being in poverty without having en...
^^^^
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to be' or 'be'.
Suggestion: to be; be
...In my regards, poor countries cant help being in poverty without having enough resour...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...without having enough resources if they dont receive the donation from the other nat...
^^^^
Line 2, column 76, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...should improve the economic climate and dont let that goes down as a bust. In additi...
^^^^
Line 2, column 163, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...the poor management affects the society so as to be in a bad way and also it might put t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 175, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a bad way" with adverb for "bad"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...agement affects the society so as to be in a bad way and also it might put the young generat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 246, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...put the young generation under pressure so as to increase the level of crime in that cou...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...expert engineers and skillful employees so as to develop the economic occasion. Conseque...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, if, so, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21602787456 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9619266134 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599303135889 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.6796084328 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.7 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124461636716 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384789416229 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474119713257 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0650287222816 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418290625814 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.