The dress codes in entire periods were used by the workers in some corporations, making them lack of fashion. Nonetheless, it is considered that worker can reduce the expenditure for purchasing uniforms as the positive side.
Granted, the old-fashioned is an impact for employees using the specific apparel, and it implies them less productivity. Since companies choose the same type and color of uniforms, the workers often get that one which are not suitable with their bodies, and this hampers the perform at the office. To illustrate, there are 1,000 workers in Alibaba wearing black and white garments from Monday to Friday, while 60% of them are unappropriated with their arms because the size have average 100 x 50 cm. Also, they make comments on managers that dress code decrease their confident. Albeit this can reduce their self-confidence, I believe that costumes create more fair for workers without the differences between the high and trivial economical.
On the other hands, using the uniforms is given by the corporations to their staffs may save the finances, leading to have hoard for emergency condition. As such, the workers do not need to waste their time choosing the fit garments even if they have holiday, and then they could allocate the money to maintain their health. According to BPJS, 100% workers in Pertamina is register to have life insurance because most of them suffer from cough ailment, and they save money around Rp. 2,000,000 each month to that service. In addition, they prefer to drain their holiday time, going to the beaches with their families. If the worker use the garments, they can make their companies becoming well-known in the public as my opinion.
To recapitulate, I assure that uniforms can save the workers salary because they do not spend their time to find it, and they can use the money to take care for their healthy. Otherwise, these garments often are not fit for their bodies, so the companies should produce the suitable and fashionable ones.
- the map below show the village of stokeford in1930 and 2010 summarise the information and make comparison where relevant 67
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 78
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 66
- The bar chart below shows the distribution of different income groups of men aged 25 44 in Sydney according to whether they were born in Australia or overseas 78
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ble with their bodies, and this hampers the perform at the office. To illustrate, there are...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'hoarded'.
Suggestion: hoarded
... may save the finances, leading to have hoard for emergency condition. As such, the w...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and they save money around Rp. 2,000,000 each month to that service. In addition,...
^^
Line 5, column 641, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th their families. If the worker use the garments, they can make their companies ...
^^
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...te, I assure that uniforms can save the workers salary because they do not spend their ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are often
...heir healthy. Otherwise, these garments often are not fit for their bodies, so the compan...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, nonetheless, so, then, well, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03592814371 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61615663155 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565868263473 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7167207006 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.142857143 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195590880868 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749053142471 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037976212403 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124077443701 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361709953945 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.