In some countries employees are generally given two weeks of paid vacation time each year. In other countries employers are given four or six weeks of paid vacation time.
Considering the need of both employee and employer, what do you think is a reasonable amount of paid vacation time for employees to have? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience
It is always a debatable question that how many week's time period is ideal for workers to rejuvenate . Owing to this, few nations render fifteen days of holiday time every year, whereas others offer four to six months vacation. By contemplating requirements of employee and employer, I deem that staff-members should have at leased four weeks of paid vacation time which I will elucidate in following paragraphs.
To commence with, breaks at regular interval of time is very essential for every human beings from their daily mundane. This is because people get frustrated and exhausted by living same kind of lifestyle for a longer period of time. Consequently, work efficiency and productivity are getting decreased that is undesirable for managing director because ultimately it is their loss in term of having least production. To exemplify, a survey from Times of India showed that profit ratio of some companies was higher which were providing holidays at fix time period as compared to firms in which least vacation was offered. Therefore, the argument is justifiable that vacations should be given to employees at particular time span.
The secondary reason to bolster the notion of rendering long vacations is that personal life also has significant influence in a person's life. As people will have more time to spend with their kith and kin on vacation, they will be more happier in their private. As a result, advantage will be gotten by firms because when an individual has satisfaction in their personal life, work output proliferates. For example, one of the companies in my city offers foreign holidays to their workers on festivals with their family and it becomes the most profitable organization of the city due to loyalty of employees to their employer as they consider the company of their own. Hence, it is preferable to render holidays to employer for the betterment of the firm.
To recapitulate, it is concluded that boss should allow their staff-members to escape from their routine life-cycle for the professional as well as overall growth of an individual. Furthermore, it is recommended that before making any decision regarding vacation, employers should circumspect all the consequences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...eriod is ideal for workers to rejuvenate . Owing to this, few nations render fifte...
^^
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ing same kind of lifestyle for a longer period of time. Consequently, work efficiency and prod...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'having the least'.
Suggestion: having the least
... ultimately it is their loss in term of having least production. To exemplify, a survey from...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'which the least'.
Suggestion: which the least
...fix time period as compared to firms in which least vacation was offered. Therefore, the ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 130, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ife also has significant influence in a persons life. As people will have more time to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 233, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'happier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: happier
... kith and kin on vacation, they will be more happier in their private. As a result, advantag...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, hence, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, kind of, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22625698324 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93474628878 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575418994413 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9054099934 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.733333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8666666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194473326168 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684268050168 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712742542229 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122589045651 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985740736175 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.