In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In Kazakhstan, there is an issue about people, whose income is exceptionally larger than the average one. Some politicians claim that it is beneficial for society while some economists say that their income should be under governmental regulation. This essay will discuss both points of view and agrees with the idea of regulating and restricting these incomes.
The reason why large salaries bring benefits to the government is that people with that high income pay much higher taxes. This money could be directly used to maintain many areas of social life, including building roads, paying extra money to teachers, providing medical treatment with discount, allocating more scholarships and assisting jobless people. For example, in Europe, people who earn more than 100000 euro a year, are obliged to pay more than 50% of it to the government, which uses it to support unemployed people and give a scholarship to children from disadvantaged families, so that they feel necessary to the public.
However, some social workers think that the government ought to take control of high incomes. Resentment in society for inequality is the main reason for this opinion. The amount of money rich people spend has always caused dissatisfaction in lower classes of society. This situation sometimes leads to crimes towards wealthy people. For example, in Kazakhstan, one of the motivations, why people commit a crime, is the jealousy of becoming as rich as their victims, who have exceptionally large incomes.
In conclusion, after analysing, it is clear that even though uncommonly high salaries have some positive effects on economy, a sense of equality is more essential in a stable community, since people, who do not that much money, might get enraged once they see how rich people squander fabulous sums of money on luxury things.
- Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- You have a full-time job and you are also doing a part-time evening course. You now find that you cannot continue the course.Write a letter to your teachers. In your letter:describe the situationexplain why you cannot continue at this timesay what action 78
- The television is good for people.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of watching television.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 84
- Your neighbours have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house/ flat.Write a letter to your neighbours. In your letterexplain the reasons for the noiseapologisedescribe what action you will take 89
- Some people think that parents should give their children complete freedom Others feel that parents should limit their children s freedom Discuss both views and give your opinion 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ulating and restricting these incomes. The reason why large salaries bring bene...
^^^
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'euro' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'euros'.
Suggestion: euros
...urope, people who earn more than 100000 euro a year, are obliged to pay more than 50...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat they feel necessary to the public. However, some social workers think that ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... who have exceptionally large incomes. In conclusion, after analysing, it is cl...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23389830508 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75557151516 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613559322034 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.2040366815 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.666666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274266217682 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923439038514 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517211031447 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149467016331 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430245803347 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.