In some countries, the number of people who visit art galleries is declining. What are the reasons for this? How can we solve this problem?
Preserving connections with our past is an admirable objective and visiting art galleries are considered to be the contributing factor in this invaluable process. There seem to be two main causes involved and several possible solutions which we will discuss here.
It must be admitted that parents are much concerned on the academic development of their children and the culture to visit museums, theaters and other cultural events has been declining for the last two decades. The revolution of the internet has replaced most of our activities with online media or video on-demand, resulted in convenience for most of the people to watch it at their own pace. Furthermore, the lack of investment or funding for public events and security at public places seem to be the another major cause as we can see, for instance, in Pakistan.
Possible solutions might involve, taking a long-term approach by adequate counseling of parents, that how the culture is conserved that help to maintain the fabric of society and could be handed down between generations. Most countries such as India or Pakistan have a rich heritage of legends and folklore which could be displayed in various events in the form of stories, drama and art with the help of traditional costumes. Another solution is to promote more outdoor activities through media platforms, such as if sports champion or figureheads speak out about the benefits, the message may well get through to children. A final response would be to encourage investment on infrastructure, and this way general public could be attracted to visit art galleries.
In conclusion, while technology is providing convenience, there are certain drawbacks as we are compromising the significance or art and music in forms ranging from opera to traditional shanties and dirges that is helping to maintain our cultures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-30 | Faraj.khalikov | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | khanpeter | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | Bhawna Sharma | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 707, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...estment on infrastructure, and this way general public could be attracted to visit art galleri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19397993311 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9086647145 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598662207358 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.4207867316 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.3 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150275540211 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579574329868 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448006896994 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.087853811659 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318822860593 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.