Some countries welcome the foreigners to become part of their culture, there are, however, certain rigid societies which do not show broad-mindedness in this regard.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is universally acknowledged fact that culture is the asset of a country. Although many nations allow people from other countries to mix with their locals, whereas others do not want outsiders to become part of their religious, social and traditional believes. However, in my opinion, I consider that countries had better encourage people from abroad for the flourishment of their culture.
On the one hand, travelling to a country results in cultural enrichment. Mixing with local culture results in cultural diversity and it becomes part of their identity. Moreover, when they travel back to the native country with the beliefs of that civilization usually in terms of language, tradition, religion, thus, resulting in the spreading of civilization across the border. Hence more people have the opportunity to learn about the cultural heritage of a country. While I agree that giving opportunities about the adaptation of local lifestyle to foreigners by the nations is a great way of highlighting state on the globe.
On the other hand, adopting an unfamiliar culture result in misrepresentation, and false drawing of the beliefs of a specific society hence lacerating locals in regards to their cultural heritage. Hence, many nations unwelcome foreigners to adopt their culture. For example, a dialect of a society has a proper accent, pronunciation and specific writing style when a bizarre individual try to adopt and use that language he made mistakes and unable to convey thoughts and the ideas to the other resulting in an awkward situation. However, I believe that restricting people mixing in local culture results in the isolation of a country.
To recapitulate, nations may vary in their opinions whether to preserve or spreading of culture I believe that motivating attitude in order to opt a culture is a positive approach resulting in enrichment.
- In many countries, criminal trials in law courts are being shown on television for the general public.Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Young people are often influenced by their peers Do the advantages of peer pressure outweigh the disadvantages 60
- Success is often measured by wealth and material belongings.Do you think wealth is the best measure of success?What makes a successful person ? 73
- People find it difficult to speak in front of the public or to give a presentation.How important is to speak well in public.Do you think children at school should be taught public speaking? 84
- Some people think that the range of technology currently available is increasing the gap between rich and poor people. Others think that it is causing the opposite effect.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beliefs' (noun) instead of believes (verb)?
Suggestion: beliefs
...their religious, social and traditional believes. However, in my opinion, I consider tha...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ding of civilization across the border. Hence more people have the opportunity to lea...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...out the cultural heritage of a country. While I agree that giving opportunities about...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...pecific society hence lacerating locals in regards to their cultural heritage. Hence, many na...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, whereas, while, as to, for example, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29530201342 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02762679841 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523489932886 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8700171247 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.384615385 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148707852949 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587121715382 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469671374463 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945242005406 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456231916681 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.