In order to increase productivity in workplaces, many companies and businesses provide incentives such as subsidized memberships of sports centers and gyms to their employees; however, some people argue that such encouragements have no benefits. Although there are some good arguments on both sides, I believe that the advantages of this development are obvious.
On the one hand, many commentators are of the view that there are some advantages of providing employees with subsidized membership of sports facilities. Workers who receive such incentives may become more motivated to do physical exercises. This, in turn, can help them to be fresher and more energetic in their workplaces and do their job far better. Also, physical exercises can help workers to keep their body healthy, and this may decrease the number of leave of absence in the workplace. Thus, having such healthy, fresh and energetic staff can influence companies positively.
On the other hand, some people subscribe to the view that offering such incentives has no benefit for companies. They argue that many employees are too busy with their job and do not have enough time to go to the sports club. They add that if such staff find free time, they more likely to spend it with their families or friends. Additionally, many workers are simply not sporty. In fact, they may not enjoy physical exercises despite receiving incentives from their companies, and they may prefer to spend their time on other types of recreational activities or on social media.
In conclusion, I think subsidized membership of sports club and gyms can have positive impacts on companies because many employees can take advantage of such incentives and keep their body and mind healthy and fresh. In this way, they become more motivated to do their job properly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... their body and mind healthy and fresh. In this way, they become more motivated to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, thus, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16216216216 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75833784813 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496621621622 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9602825053 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.142857143 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244176225048 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936987542496 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431620132617 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162115805183 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00882724702861 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.