Some employers for their employees subsidized membership of gyms and sports clubs,believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so.Consider the arguments from both aspects of t

Essay topics:

Some employers for their employees subsidized membership of gyms and sports clubs,
believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so.
Consider the arguments from both aspects of this possible debate, and reach a conclusion.

Fitness and health awareness camps are common in the organizations to keep their staff fit and active while working, which help the organization to achieve higher targets are thought by some employers. However, others do not agree and believe there are no fruitful results by aforesaid idea. Before reaching to a conclusion, it is important to discuss both aspects of this argument.
On the one side, knowledge of good diet and exercise in daily routine helps the person to remain fit while working in an organization. Especially workers are requested to more breaks of short intervals while performing repetitive tasks, which benefits them to remain active and stable while working for long hours. Hence, some organization have gyms and refreshing units inside the accommodation and corporate offices. Therefore, I believe that this culture should be encouraged in the organizations to minimize the chance of errors from staffs.
Conversely, fitness activities takes time of an individual and some employers feels that these are unnecessary activities that only increase the number of tasks for the organization instead of making it better financially. Therefore such companies preferred to provide financial support to their employees like bonuses and financial rewards rather than providing gym or sports memberships. In addition to that, management finds it difficult to calculate the profits from the health fitness camps.
To conclude, more fitter and active workers always beneficial for the organization although, the precise computation is difficult to know the exact output from the employees. It is irrefutable the experts will find the solution of computation as well in future.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-12 preet kaur 78 view
2019-07-03 bhatvishal@ 61 view
2019-07-02 bhatvishal@ 61 view
2019-07-02 bhatvishal@ 61 view
2019-04-24 sai girish 78 view
Essays by user bhatvishal@ :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...nstead of making it better financially. Therefore such companies preferred to provide fin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 14, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'fitter' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: fitter
...he health fitness camps. To conclude, more fitter and active workers always beneficial fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ind the solution of computation as well in future.
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49808429119 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92628016985 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639846743295 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2499232657 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.583333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225899547612 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696820957613 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329297118493 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119784585927 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391261526831 0.056905535591 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.