Nowadays a competitive society, organizations intend to feel up to communicate their workers regardless of wherever they are in order to keep regular works. This method may have several positives, however, it does have several negatives also.
To begin with, it is necessary to be able to get in touch with an assistant especially when difficult moments at work on in event of a calamity. In an example, clinics demand to be able to contact their workers in case of victim edges, injury, and distress. This can assist protect life or several lives. While fixing certain tasks, a phone call or email can save a presentation, draft, or win a bargain to the foundation. Some organizations, for example, by telephone, need their employees on call throughout the year. Any failure to do so may result in a loss of business and income.
Contacting workers does not regularly benefit organizations. To start with, no workman likes to get in touch with by their hirer when they are at home or on the fiesta. This can cause resentment towards the employer. Many people have to labor day and night. They even take their work home. This leads to fatigue, which can lead to health risks and other related problems. Moreover, the employee may feel unhappy at his workplace and may even consider seeking job opportunities elsewhere. No employer benefits from an unhappy workforce as it may affect the growth and success of an organization.
In concluding of my word, communicating an assistant may show useful in some situations, it may have a bearing on employee pleasure and health. It could even lead to attrition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...however, it does have several negatives also. To begin with, it is necessary to b...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, to begin with, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93014705882 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85653720835 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602941176471 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8622527828 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.5 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1111111111 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192632929244 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565770767777 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299672223196 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109664981006 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314832627298 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.0946893788 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.