Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today’s society.
To what extent do you agree with this view?
As a way of making potential customers purchase their products, businesses utilize advertising. But some people consider of lot of these methods as not ethical, and therefore, not acceptable. I concur that many of the techniques applied are reprehensible because they promote immorality and violence.
One of the negative effects of some concepts employed by companies in marketing their wares to buyers encourages immorality. Just to get the attention of clients, morally depraving gimmicks are used, and they are done without thinking about the repercussions. For instance, recently on television, viewers in Nigeria were assailed by an advertisement on a brand of brandy, which a couple on a date at a restaurant drank. But apart from television watchers seeing the couple sip the alcohol, they also saw them kiss on air. Such a video should be censored by the Nigerian Broadcasting Commission because it encourages indecent attitudes.
Another negative inherent in these reproachable tactics used by advertisers is that some of them promote violence. An advertisement may want to target the youth or young men, and the message might be to showcase vigour and virility. In other to achieve this, video clips that have people fighting may be shown. For example, there was another commercial on television which marketed a brand of energy drink. The video had two men exchanging punches. As it turned out, one knocked down the other and the winner jumped up in celebration. In other words, viewers were made to think it was the energy booster that invigorated the victor.
In conclusion, I disagree with many of the unscrupulous strategies used by advertising companies to persuade their targeted market because their campaigns often encourage indecency and violent behaviors. A more thoughtful-approach will go a long way in improving advertisements and help to sanitize the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-20 | cozimo | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-09 | mahtab.torkamaneh@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2020-06-11 | Umair hussain | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | ashita | 56 | view |
- Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant s past criminal record This protects the person who is being accused of the crime Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed 61
- Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant s past criminal record This protects the person who is being accused of the crime Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed 73
- Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant s past criminal record This protects the person who is being accused of the crime Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed 73
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today s society To what extent do you agree with this view 84
- Companies should provide sports and social facilities for local communities To what extent do you agree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...approach will go a long way in improving advertisements and help to sanitize the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, so, therefore, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33779264214 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11566779735 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61872909699 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.78345452 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8823529412 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5882352941 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10161160903 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0282799143962 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375040662738 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0600798645543 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227975519804 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.