Some people argue that the government should give every unemployed person a mobile phone and should make sure they have access to the Internet.
They believe this is the best way of using public money to reduce the problem of unemployment.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Unemployment is a major problem that governments across the world are trying to solve. Some people hold the opinion that governments must tackle this issue by making sure every unemployed person is provided a mobile phone with internet. I believe that putting such measures in place shall provide great assistance to the unemployed for making job applications.
The way jobs are posted nowadays has changed completely. Job advertisements in newspapers or weekly periodicals are now obsolete. Almost all jobs are posted on job portals such as LinkedIn, Seek and Indeed. It is imperative to have access to internet to apply for jobs through these platforms. Considering the high costs of internet, providing access to the web would be a crucial aid from the government to people looking for jobs.
Another important change that has occurred in the hiring process is the way interviews are conducted. Employers want to conduct video interviews over Skype, Microsoft Teams rather than traditional telephonic discussions. Mobile phones come in handy as they carry all these applications and are more convenient and portable than laptops and computers. Moreover, interviewers expect a quick turnaround time and higher availability from job applicants. Having a mobile makes sure a job applicant is always readily available to taken calls and have a direct discussion, thereby decreasing the turnaround time. Hence, I believe providing a mobile phone with video call capabilities can be of great help to job seekers. Although this could put an additional burden on the government, it would pay off once a person gets the job and starts paying taxes to the government.
In conclusion, mobile and internet are the two most important tools a person needs for applying jobs. Governments must provide these two important and crucial tools to unemployed people to enable them to apply for more jobs which can thereby reduce unemployment in the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-20 | Nadish | 84 | view |
| 2021-01-17 | Prasanna Lakshmi | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-17 | Prasanna Lakshmi | 78 | view |
- Very few schoolchildren learn about the value of money and how to look after it yet this is a critical life skill that should be taught as part of the school curriculum Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people argue that the government should give every unemployed person a mobile phone and should make sure they have access to the Internet They believe this is the best way of using public money to reduce the problem of unemployment To what extent do 78
- television dominates the free time for too many people It can make people lazy and prevent them from socializing with others Do you agree or disagree Give a reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 56
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Agree or disagree 61
- Many working people get little or no exercise either during the working day or in their free time and have health problems as a result Why do so many working people not get enough exercise What can be done about this problem 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, look, moreover, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28709677419 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90043055399 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1622185879 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4117647059 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2352941176 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88235294118 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245588279459 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769125616748 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077112174193 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161596217702 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892696629485 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.