Some people argue that technological inventions, such as mobile phones, are making people socially less interactive. Do you agree or disagree?
Scientific inventions have completely changed our life in a number of ways. Many individuals consider that these discoveries are keeping people away from the society. In my opinion, I agree that these tools provide a variety of options for an individual and keeps them busy with it.
Firstly, the use of applications in the gadgets makes people addicted to these services. In this technical world, people do not require to move out during their leisure time, mobile phones play an active role in keeping the person busy in their free time. For instance, these social networking sites Facebook or WhatsApp gives all the updates on things happening around the world. Hence, people do not need to talk neighbors about things happening in the society.
Secondly, these tools help in making shopping easier as well as saving time, therefore the requirement to move out for purchasing is avoided. Our daily requirements are filled through these smart tools by purchasing things through internet, which saves a lot of time for an individual to go out in the market. For example, online shopping applications like Amazon on phones allow people to select items on phone for purchasing and deliver the product at door step, which makes more convenient as compare with the traditional way of style to buying things.
In conclusion, smart phones have made communication better with the help of internet. Although these things are isolating the concept of social society and makes individual busy in his own life through various tools. Hence, I believe that these tools are making the world smaller but away from each other.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-14 | bhatvishal@ | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | bhatvishal@ | 67 | view |
| 2018-07-04 | jchalana85 | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future. Others, by contrast, are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than h 73
- Some employers for their employees subsidized membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so. Consider the arguments from both aspects of 61
- Some people think that schools should reward students who have the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show progress. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- You are applying for a job and need a letter of reference.Write a letter to the former teacher.Give detail of the jobExplain why it is important.Suggest what information your teacher could put in the reference. 78
- By punishing murderers with the death penalty, society is also guilty of committing murder. Therefore, life in prison is a better punishment for murderers.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 137, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'moving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: moving
... technical world, people do not require to move out during their leisure time, mobile p...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 54, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...se tools help in making shopping easier as well as saving time, therefore the requ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07894736842 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.563747156 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586466165414 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4710891865 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.923076923 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131593577884 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527567027902 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434886667357 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840435437492 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506396380242 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.